Design Guide › Dee
Cyclotron dee design rules
169 of the guide’s 1878 rules carry the dee tag.
Rules for the accelerating electrodes: dee and dummy-dee geometry, gap and aperture, dee-to-ground spacing, support stems and insulators, and the voltage a given geometry will hold.
Each rule keeps its formula where the source gives one, a verbatim quote, a page-level
citation, and a stable identifier (dg-NNNN) that resolves here and on the
all-in-one guide. Where an editorial note says
“the reference machine”, its parameters are on the
guide’s front page.
By applicability level: level 1 (2) · level 2 (82) · level 3 (63) · level 4 (21) · level 5 (1) — levels rank breadth, never license to skip (method). Related domains, by shared rules: RF (110), Fabrication (25), Beam dynamics (23), Ion source (17), Vacuum (16). To combine tags or levels, open this domain in the filterable view.
Verify before use. Every rule here is a source extract in the vocabulary of the editorial methodology — faithful to its cited page, not an independently validated engineering requirement. Re-read any rule that drives a real design decision at the cited page before committing metal, money, or high voltage to it. The editorial note under each quote is this site’s extrapolation to a tabletop machine, not something the source said: an editor’s judgement, audited for overreach, never a citation.
Inductive: coupling loop
Capacitive: series capacitor / probe
-
Expect the 1%-uniform region of a flat-pole magnet to end well inside the pole radius - the measured case: 0.493 T uniform to 1% out to 6.19 cm on 7.6 cm radius poles, about 80% - and note the quoted geometry: their RF electrode at 7.14 cm CONTAINED the full uniform region, keeping acceleration inside it.
r_uniform(1%) ~ 0.8 * r_poleSource quote & editorial note
The magnetic field is uniform at 0.493 T, to within one percent, out to a radius of 6.19 cm... The RF electrode radius is 7.14 cm containing the full uniform region.
King, A Preliminary Design for a Small Permanent Magnet Cyclotron — Houghton College thesis (2002) — p. 22-23
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Suggests planning the reference machine's usable beam radius around ~80% of the 8-in pole (~3.2 in) unless shims extend the flat region - with the machine's own field map as the arbiter (dg-098, dg-638).
Cited in: Cyclotron Magnet Design
-
A workable student-cyclotron design point for ~1.5 MeV protons: 10-inch pole faces, 17,000 gauss, 25.68 MHz RF, 10-14 kV dee-to-dee at 2 kW RF, giving 2 uA of beam (about 1.3e13 protons/s).
10 in poles, 1.7 T, 25.68 MHz, Vdee 10-14 kV, 2 kW RF, 2 uA, 1.5 MeVSource quote & editorial note
Size: 10-inch pole diameter ... Dee voltage: 10,000 to 14,000 volts dee-to-dee; R.F. power: 2,000 watts; R.F. frequency: 25.68 megacycles ... Magnetic field strength: 17,000 gauss
McGuire, The Iowa State University 1.5 MeV Undergraduate Cyclotron (1961) — p. 9
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The closest historical analogue to a next machine's target: same pole diameter as the reference machine, and the ~3x field buys the ~10x energy (E ~ B^2*r^2 at fixed radius). The ~10x dee voltage buys turn count, phase margin and beam survival at that field - not the energy ceiling itself.
-
A proven parameter set at exactly the reference machine's scale: 12 in poles, 4 in gap with removable 1 in pole tips, 1.2 T max, single 5 in radius dee with 0.9 in aperture, 2-30 MHz RF at up to 1.5 kW giving ~10 kV dee, 1e-5 Torr operating pressure.
12 in poles / 4 in gap / 1.2 T / 5 in dee / 0.9 in aperture / 1.5 kW -> ~10 kV dee / 1e-5 TorrSource quote & editorial note
12 inch diameter poles pieces forming a 4-inch gap to which upper and lower pole tips up to 1-inch thick can be easily attached and removed. ... all capable of producing a maximum central axial field, Bz(r=0), of 1.2 Tesla ... a single 5-inch radius DEE with a 0.9 inch vertical aperture and a matching dummy DEE. The Radio Frequency (RF) supply is tunable from 2 to 30 MHz with adjustable power up to 1.5 kW ... capable of achieving a peak DEE voltages on the order of 10 kV ... the 2-inch tall, 13-inch diameter cyclotron vacuum chamber's operating pressure of 1E-5 Torr.
Koeth, Undergraduate Education with the Rutgers 12-Inch Cyclotron (2015) — p. 2
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A complete cross-check machine for a next machine's sizing; note the removable-pole-tip trick that lets one magnet host many field profiles.
-
Size the Dee tank circuit from the Dee capacitance: on the cited machine ~76 pF of Dee against a 0.87 uH secondary resonates up to 19.5 MHz (411 keV protons at its 1.28 T maximum field), with both inductors wound from 1/4 inch copper tubing coaxially - 6 cm diameter primary outside a 4 cm secondary - and coupling set by swapping primaries of different turn counts.
cited machine: C_dee ~ 76 pF, L >= 0.87 uH -> f up to 19.5 MHz; 1/4 in copper tubing; 6 cm dia primary over 4 cm dia secondary; interchangeable primaries set couplingSource quote & editorial note
the Dee may be oscillated with voltage amplitudes of up to approximately 3000V relative to the grounded Dummy Dee. The Dee capacitance is approximately 76 pF. The secondary coil inductance of 0.87 uH or more in parallel with the Dee capacitance yields a resonance as high at 19.5 MHz, which is the maximum cyclotron frequency corresponding to 411 keV protons in the maximum magnetic field of 1.28 T. ... These inductors are 1/4 inch copper tubing, wound coaxially, with the 6 cm diameter primary coil outside the 4 cm diameter secondary coil. The inductance of the primary coil can be changed by replacing the coil with one having a different number of turns, several of which have been constructed
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Concrete worked values at the same scale, but measure your own machine's total capacitance (dee + stray + coil) and size the coil from L = 1/((2*pi*f)^2 * C_total); the swappable-primary approach lets you retune coupling without rebuilding the tank. The 411 keV is that machine's figure at its own field and extraction radius.
-
Estimate dee capacitance by summing parallel-plate sections of the dee-to-chamber geometry - the memo's three-section sum gave 77.5 pF calculated (70.5 pF top+bottom, 7.04 pF edge) against the quoted 78.1 pF measured on an L-C meter: 'Nice agreement seen!'
C_total = 2*A_top*eps0/d_top + A_edge*eps0/d_edge; Rutgers: 70.5 pF (top+bottom) + 7.04 pF (edge) = 77.5 pF vs 78.1 pF measuredSource quote & editorial note
C_top+bottom = 2C = 70.5 pF ... C_edge = 7.04 pF ... For a total C of: 77.5pF. Measurement of the capacitance with an L-C meter yields a value of 78.1pF. Nice agreement seen!
Koeth, Theoretical Calculations and Measurements of the DEE Voltage in the Rutgers 12 Inch Cyclotron (2005) — p. PDF 1 (page 1 of the September 2005 Koeth memo) as cited
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Directly usable on the reference machine's 8-inch dee: sum simple parallel-plate terms for top/bottom/edge and verify with a cheap L-C meter before winding the tank coil.
-
Peak-to-peak dee voltage of an inductively coupled tank follows Vp-p = 2*sqrt(2*P*L/(Rs*C)), i.e. it scales as the square root of forward power; the square-root trend held over all measured power ranges (5 W to 1300 W).
Vp-p = 2*sqrt(2*P*L/(Rs*C)); Vpeak = sqrt(2*P*L/(Rs*C))Source quote & editorial note
the trend of DEE voltage to follow the square root law of the input RF power is accurate over all measured power ranges
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The sizing equation for the reference machine's LDMOS upgrade - with P as the power actually DELIVERED to the tank: at a good match forward power approximates it; otherwise net out the reflected fraction first. Doubling dee voltage costs 4x power, so 1.3 kV to 5-13 kV needs a 15-100x power increase unless L/C or Rs improves (dg-239's knobs).
-
Do not budget a tank's effective series resistance from the coil alone: the Rutgers coil computed ~50 mOhm (1.3 mOhm/inch of 1/4-inch Cu tube), but the assembled system behaved 'as if Rs had the value of 800 mOhm' - an INFERRED effective series resistance sixteen times the coil's, which the memo attributes to the stainless chamber return, the stainless Conflat stem support, and the feedthroughs.
Rutgers: Rs_coil ~ 0.05 ohm estimated, Rs_system 0.8 ohm measured (16x). The factor is specific to that return path, stem, feedthroughs and frequencySource quote & editorial note
as if Rs had the value of 800mOhm - sixteen times that of the expected coil Rs ... take into account the stainless steel vacuum chamber return, the stainless steel Conflat DEE stem support and RF feed throughs.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: When predicting a next machine's dee voltage, include every RF current path - chamber return, stem, feedthroughs, contacts - and prefer copper returns where possible; then measure the assembled tank's Q and infer Rs from it rather than assume a multiplier. [Note revised 2026-08-23: earlier note told the builder to 'expect ~1 ohm scale Rs', a number that belongs to Rutgers' geometry.]
-
For a given RF power the only knobs that raise dee voltage are minimizing Rs or increasing tank inductance L while decreasing dee capacitance C to hold the resonant frequency.
Vp-p = 2*sqrt(2*P*L/(Rs*C)) => maximize L/C ratio, minimize Rs at fixed f0 = 1/(2*pi*sqrt(LC))Source quote & editorial note
minimizing Rs, or increasing L2 while simultaneously decreasing C2 (to maintain the resonant frequency) are the only parameters that can be adjusted to increase the DEE voltage for a given amount of RF power.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: For a next machine, shrinking dee-to-liner capacitance (larger dee-to-lid spacing) and a bigger low-loss coil raise dee voltage before amplifier watts do - bought, not free: more L usually brings more conductor and more Rs, and dee-to-lid spacing spends the magnet-gap budget (dg-163). Optimize the L/C-versus-Rs package together, then buy watts.
-
On the cited 12-inch machine's resonator (L = 1.1 uH, C = 78.1 pF, estimated AC resistance 50 mOhm), ~1000 W forward power produced ~15 kV p-p dee voltage; the chamber withstood 2000 W but the tank, housing, chamber and dee stem became very warm.
1000 W -> ~15 kVp-p measured; 2000 W withstood with significant heatingSource quote & editorial note
inductance of 1.1uHy, capacitance of 78.1pF, and the estimated AC resistance of 50mOhm ... Preliminary tests with the new generator show that the cyclotron chamber is capable of withstanding 2000 watts of input power. The tank, tank housing, cyclotron chamber and DEE stem become very warm. It is not necessary to operate at 2000 watts, as shown above 1000 watts produces a peak-to-peak DEE voltage of approximately 15kV.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Scales the reference machine's plan only under ideal sqrt-power scaling at unchanged loaded shunt impedance: 500 W -> ~10.6 kVp-p, comfortably in the 5-13 kV target - but measure the actual dee voltage with a calibrated pickup; thermal management of stem and coil becomes the real issue.
-
Choose dee-to-lid clearance for the working dee voltage: MIT's 1.25-in clearance (5-in lid gap) capped dee voltage at ~70 kV by breakdown, and the source's remedies are greater clearance plus round, smooth contours and clean, polished surfaces.
MIT: 5-in gap between lids, 2.5-in dee height, 1.25-in clearance -> ~70 kV limit (~56 kV/in working gradient)Source quote & editorial note
The gap between chamber lids was chosen to be 5 in., leaving 1 1/4-in. clearance between D's and lids ... resulting in a D-voltage limit of about 70 kv due to breakdown. ... The limit can be raised by designing for greater clearance between D's and chamber lids and by providing round, smooth contours and clean, polished surfaces.
Livingston & Blewett, Particle Accelerators (1962) — p. 175, 189
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: At 1.3 kV the reference machine has large margin against this failure mode. For a next machine at several kV, treat MIT's ~56 kV/in at breakdown as one calibration point, not an allowable: analyze peak surface fields, round and polish, assemble clean, and expect to condition (see dg-253) - no universal safe kV/in exists for vacuum gaps.
-
Water-cool powered dees: cooling tubes spaced as closely as 2-3 in prevented local heating and warping of MIT-class dees under power, with approximately 10 kW of heat dissipated in each dee and dee line during operation; the MIT dees are tapered over the outer half of their radius to a rounded edge of 2-in diameter. [2026-09-06 scan re-read: the earlier generic dees-shaped-to-the-beam-envelope clause is not on the cited page and is withdrawn; the page's concrete MIT taper replaces it.]
cooling-tube pitch 2-3 in on MIT-class powered dees; ~10 kW dissipated per dee + dee lineSource quote & editorial note
these tubes spaced as closely as 2 to 3 in. to prevent local heating and warping of the D's under power. Approximately 10 kw of heat is dissipated in each D and D line during operation.
Livingston & Blewett, Particle Accelerators (1962) — p. PDF p.175 (printed p.159)
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: At tens of RF watts the builder likely needs no water, but check rather than assume: what matters is local RF current density and the thermal path, not total power. Dee thermal drift detunes the resonator - keep dee structures stiff and thermally anchored, and watch tuning drift as power rises.
-
Fit one or more trimmer capacitors adjustable by remote control under full power - a movable plate on the chamber side wall facing a dee edge, with excellent RF contact to the wall and ~1 percent frequency range - to trim the relative resonant frequencies of the two dee circuits and adjust relative dee voltage.
tuning range ~1% in frequencySource quote & editorial note
A technique frequently used to adjust or trim the relative resonant frequencies of the two D-line circuits is to use one or more trimmer capacitors which can be adjusted by remote control under full power operation. Such a variable capacitance can be provided by a movable plate on the side wall of the chamber facing one edge of the D. It must have excellent electrical contact to the walls for the radiofrequency currents and a range of motion sufficient to tune over about 1 per cent in frequency. The availability of such a tuning device makes it possible to adjust relative D voltage as desired for optimum operation.
Livingston & Blewett, Particle Accelerators (1962) — p. 188
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A bellows-actuated plate near the dee gives the builder live resonance trim without opening the chamber - invaluable when thermal drift walks the dee frequency.
-
Use one driven dee against the grounded chamber wall (dummy dee) instead of two dees: it halves the RF feedthrough count and the whole chamber becomes the return electrode - the standard simplification for small machines.
Source quote & editorial note
it has one dee-shaped copper electrode, and the grounded vacuum chamber functions as the other electrode
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The reference machine already does this, and it stays attractive for a next machine - one HV feedthrough fewer, the chamber as return electrode - unless push-pull two-dee RF is wanted for higher energy gain per turn. A common choice among documented small machines, not a rule.
-
Iowa State's dee geometry: thin sheet-copper dees 22.5 cm in diameter and 2.4 cm high, separated by a 1.5 cm gap and water-cooled through the supporting stems - about 0.89 of their pole diameter.
dee dia 22.5 cm vs 25.4 cm pole face (0.886); dee height 2.4 cm; dee-dee gap 1.5 cmSource quote & editorial note
The dees, made of thin sheet copper, arc 22.5 cm in diameter, 2.4 cm high, and they are separated by a gap of 1.5 cm.
McGuire, The Iowa State University 1.5 MeV Undergraduate Cyclotron (1961) — p. 7
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A documented dee geometry near the reference machine's scale - note it exceeds an 8-inch pole, so it fits 10-inch-class machines as-is: scale the proportions, not the dimensions. Dee cooling need tracks the dissipated RF power and construction, not a fixed kilowatt line: compute it from the RF budget (dg-313) and watch dee temperature during commissioning.
-
A single real dee working against its image in a grounded plate is a working small-machine RF architecture - the quoted machine's arrangement, tuned by physically twisting the inductor onto the cyclotron frequency; its commercial-amp drive chain is the same paper's setup (dg-118; chain details: scan re-read queued).
f = 1/(2*pi*sqrt(LC)), C fixed by dee geometry, L adjusted (deformable coil) to tuneSource quote & editorial note
The second DEE has been faked using the image of the real DEE on a grounded conductor ... By twisting the inductor, we can change the inductance to match our inductance requirements.
Chun, The Cyclotron Magnet and RF Oscillator (2003) — p. 11
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: This is the reference machine's exact topology, in use on a comparable documented machine; the deformable-inductor trim is a simple tuning mechanism worth copying on a next machine.
-
Use single-dee construction (the grounded tank is the other 'dee') to simplify tank and oscillator; add a symmetric grounded dummy-dee edge for better ion focusing only after the machine works.
Source quote & editorial note
the 'single-dee' construction; this has many advantages ... Better ion focussing can be obtained by installing a 'dummy' grounded dee edge symmetric to the insulated dee, but this is a refinement
Wouters, General Recommendations for Design of Small Cyclotrons — UCRL-476 (1949) — p. 8
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Exactly the reference machine's architecture. The dummy-dee edge is the source's named refinement for better ion focusing - a natural next-machine upgrade once the basic machine works, which is the sequencing the source itself implies ('but this is a refinement').
-
A single dee plus grounded dummy dee doubles the required dee-to-ground voltage compared to two dees, but reduces RF feedthrough cost and complexity (two become one) - often the right trade at amateur scale. [Corrected 2026-08-23: 'the right trade' was stated without the 'often'.]
1 dee: V_required x2, feedthroughs /2Source quote & editorial note
Having only one dee rather than two doubles the voltage requirement, but reduces the cost and complexity of having two RF feedthroughs in the vacuum chamber.
Baumgartner, The Cyclotron Kids' 2 MeV Proton Cyclotron — Cyclotrons 2013, WE1PB05 (2013) — p. 2
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Supports the single-dee choice for a next machine unless attainable dee voltage, insulation or the coupling scheme becomes the binding constraint.
-
Through an autotuner chain, tens of watts yields low-kV dee voltage: Houghton reported 1700 Vpp from 26 W and 800 V from 10 W at ~3.5 MHz. [Corrected 2026-08-23: earlier text called the two points 'roughly consistent with sqrt(P) scaling'; they are not (ratio 2.1 vs 1.6 expected), and the 800 V figure's convention (peak, peak-to-peak, RMS) is not preserved in the source.]
26 W -> 1700 Vpp; 10 W -> 800 V (convention unstated). sqrt(P) scaling holds only at unchanged coupling and loaded Q; these points differ from it by ~30%Source quote & editorial note
3.55 MHz 1700 Vpp (26 W) ... 3.48 MHz 800 V (10 W)
Yuly et al., Modifications on the Houghton College Cyclotron (2010) — p. 17-19
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A benchmark for the order of magnitude the reference machine's autotuner path reaches (its ~1.3 kV from a 5 W amplifier is in the same band), not a curve to read values off: state the voltage convention, tuning and loading before comparing, and do not infer a plateau from two points.
-
Low dee voltage caps the usable field and energy through orbit count: at 800 Vpp, no beam peaks appeared for fields above ~0.5 T, where reaching full radius takes more than the ~44 orbits that worked - consistent with turn-count-limited survival at their pressures (the quote reports the disappearance; the survival reading is the team's interpretation).
N_orbits = T_final/(e*Vpp); 35 keV / 800 eV ~ 44 orbits was the practical survival limitSource quote & editorial note
No peaks for magnetic fields larger than H2+ at 0.5 T -> 35 keV; 44 orbits at 800 Vpp
Yuly et al., Modifications on the Houghton College Cyclotron (2010) — p. 21
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Quantifies why the reference machine's dee-voltage upgrade matters: at 1.3 kV their protons need ~hundreds of turns to reach interesting energies, and ~44 turns was already the survival ceiling at Houghton's pressures.
-
Rutgers' record operating point: 2 kW forward power produced 8.4 kV peak dee voltage on the 12-inch machine (measured via calibrated pickup and Bird thruline wattmeter).
2 kW -> 8.4 kV peak (~16.8 kVp-p)Source quote & editorial note
Record Input Power 2kW: 8.4 kVpeak
Koeth et al., The Rutgers 12-Inch Cyclotron for Students (2010) — p. 19
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Anchors the power budget with one measured point: 2 kW bought 8.4 kV peak on that 12-inch tank. Scaling to the reference machine's planned LDMOS runs through ITS shunt impedance (dg-313's formula with measured Q and C): at comparable impedance, 500 W supports roughly 1/2 the voltage (P ~ V^2), a ~4 kV class - measure, then budget.
-
Trade focusing against phase slip explicitly: you may drop Bz at large radius for extra focusing only if the ions have few turns left there, so raise the Dee voltage to cut the number of revolutions - fewer turns also means shorter path length and fewer gas collisions.
Source quote & editorial note
The axial component of the magnetic field can be decreased at larger radii in order to increase the radial (focusing) component, provided the ions only have a few revolutions left once they reach this portion of the field.
Morrow, Focusing in the Houghton College Cyclotron — Houghton College thesis (2015) — p. 27-28
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: One candidate for the reference machine's next big win: at ~150 keV on a low Dee voltage the turn count is large, and cutting it relaxes both the phase budget and gas-scattering exposure. Whether Dee voltage or field shaping pays more on a given machine is a diagnosis - measure what actually limits the beam first; the quote's own condition is narrower: late-radius focusing tricks need few turns remaining.
-
Raise dee voltage to raise beam current: fewer turns to a given radius means less path length and fewer gas collisions, and measured current increased with dee voltage at fixed field and pressure.
N_turns ~ E_final/(2*q*V_dee); higher V_dee -> shorter path -> higher transmitted currentSource quote & editorial note
It can be seen that in general, an increase in dee voltage results in a higher beam current.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: For a fill-gas machine, dee volts are a strong current knob - the measured trend here: fewer turns, less path, fewer collisions. Whether they are THE binding knob depends on what limits the machine that day: source output, pressure, phase acceptance and detuning all compete (dg-359, dg-525). Measure before spending.
-
The paper's machine oscillates the Dee at amplitudes up to approximately 3000 V against the grounded dummy Dee, and normal operation takes 10-40 W of RF - two statements about the same tank (its maximum and its routine point), not a measured pairing of the two.
10-40 W forward RF -> up to ~3 kV Dee amplitude; typical running 2100 VppSource quote & editorial note
the Dee may be oscillated with voltage amplitudes of up to approximately 3000V relative to the grounded Dummy Dee ... For normal operation, 10-40 W of RF power are required
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Tells the builder that Dee voltage is a tank-Q problem, not a brute-force power problem: a modest amplifier into a good resonator beats a big amplifier into a lossy one - and dg-313's formula computes the actual watts-per-kV pairing for any target.
-
When beam current was pushed up on the source machine, sparking ended the climb: momentary readings above 2 mA were too unsteady to hold, so the sustained spark-free level - not the peak meter reading - is what that machine could deliver.
Source quote & editorial note
momentary beam meter readings exceeded two milliamperes but operation at this level was very unsteady due to sparking; further increases were not attempted
Livingston & Boch, The Oak Ridge 86-Inch Cyclotron — ORNL-1196, OSTI 4357145 (1952) — p. 24
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Test discipline for a next machine's dee-voltage conditioning: rate the machine at the level it holds quietly under a defined acceptance protocol (duty cycle, thermal soak, vacuum stability, RF interlocks), not at the level it touches momentarily.
-
Bias the dees negative - insulated, DC-biased dees were the 86-inch's cure for oscillator starting difficulties due to ion loading - so the self-excited oscillator starts cleanly.
insulated dee + negative DC bias, interlocked to RF (magnitude tuned in commissioning)Source quote & editorial note
Oscillator starting difficulties due to 'ion loading' are avoided by the use of insulated negatively-biased dees.
Livingston & Boch, The Oak Ridge 86-Inch Cyclotron — ORNL-1196, OSTI 4357145 (1952) — p. 7, 47
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Directly applicable if a next machine's RF start-up stutters or the dee glows at low voltage: insulate the dee for DC and feed a negative bias through an RF choke. The same lever also bears on multipactor (dg-324), which lives in the same low-voltage start regime. The source records the method; the bias magnitude is found on the machine.
-
One machine's design point for dee-to-liner spacing: its selected 100 kV peak required about 1.5 in of vacuum clearance (~26 kV/cm), taken at the minimum because magnetic gap is precious.
cited design point: ~1.5 in clearance at 100 kV peak (~26 kV/cm); not a linear scaling lawSource quote & editorial note
The selected value of 100 kv peak voltage requires about 1.5-in. clearance from dee-to-liner ... Since the magnetic gap is so precious ... this minimum value is taken for design.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The reference machine's 1.3 kV is electrically trivial by this calibration - its clearances are set by beam aperture and mechanical tolerance. For a 20-50 kV dee on a next machine, set clearance from electrostatic analysis of the actual geometry (edges, finish, conditioning, pressure regime), not by scaling kV/cm linearly.
-
MAXIMUM energy gain per dee crossing is q*2*V0*sin(N*theta/2) for dee angular width theta at harmonic N - the particle's phase only reduces it - so half-dees and cut-away lips tax energy gain, and the tax grows with harmonic number.
dE_max per crossing = q*2*V0*sin(N*theta/2); actual gain carries the particle phase on topSource quote & editorial note
the maximum voltage gain/dee is Vd = 2*V0 sin(theta/2); for particles rotating on subharmonics of the dee frequency the angular width of the dee is n*theta to the particle
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Directly applicable when trimming a next machine's dee for probe or source clearance: keep the dee close to 180 degrees or compute the sin(N*theta/2) penalty for the harmonic in use. Fundamental-mode trims are gentle - 15 degrees off costs about 1% at N = 1 - but the same trim costs more at higher harmonics.
-
High dee voltage at practical drive power comes only from a high-Q resonant circuit - the quote; ORIC's implementation treats the dees and stems as a quarter-wave line foreshortened by dee capacitance, tuned via C, stem length, or stem impedance - the report's model, common for stem-fed dees though not universal.
dee system = lambda/4 line foreshortened by C_dee; tune via C, l, Z0Source quote & editorial note
The high dee voltage required in cyclotrons can be achieved for practical driving power only by using a high-Q resonant circuit.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Directly applicable framing for the reference machine's matching network: every dB of resonator Q lost to bad joints or lossy insulators is paid in amplifier watts.
-
If multipactor blocks RF turn-on, either bias the dees or accept a more complex drive scheme; anticipate the problem at design time rather than after assembly.
Source quote & editorial note
it is possible to bias the dees to prevent multipactoring, and a more complex booster oscillator circuit is required
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Directly applicable: multipactor lives in the low-voltage, MHz regime every starting tabletop dee passes through, so anticipate it - designing the dee stem so DC-bias insulation CAN be added is cheap at design time and expensive after. Whether the bias is actually needed is learned at first RF turn-on.
-
For a low-loss RF finish, plate with high-conductivity copper at least two skin depths thick at the operating frequency, then protect it with only a very thin low-conductivity layer or a low-loss lacquer.
t_Cu >= 2*delta; delta_Cu [um] ~ 66/sqrt(f_MHz) (22 um at 9 MHz, so plate >= ~45 um / 1.8 mil)Source quote & editorial note
a layer of high conductivity copper plating at least two skin depths in thickness, at the operating frequency, then protecting this against corrosion by a very thin layer of low conductivity plating or a layer of low-loss lacquer
Fowler, Radio Frequency Performance of Electroplated Finishes — Proc. IREE Australia (1970) — p. 10
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: For dees, stems, and tank coils at 9 MHz: copper at least ~45 um thick plus a thin low-loss protective finish beats unspecified decorative plating; properly specified high-conductivity silver can do better still, and nickel remains excluded on permeability grounds (dg-222).
-
Smooth the RF surface: machining leaves a low-conductivity Beilby layer and 'hill and dale' current paths, so chemically or electrolytically polish conductors to lower RF loss.
Source quote & editorial note
Several reasons have been given for the decrease in conductivity below the bulk values, including: (a) the Beilby layer ... (c) the hill and dale effect ... This last problem has been investigated fully by Benson who recommends chemical or electrolytic polishing to produce a smooth surface and lower losses.
Fowler, Radio Frequency Performance of Electroplated Finishes — Proc. IREE Australia (1970) — p. 8
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Polishing dee edges and stems lowers RF resistance. Smooth, clean, well-conditioned electrodes may also reduce field emission, but the breakdown voltage must be established by field analysis and testing - do not book the second benefit in advance.
-
In the cited 12-inch geometry modelled in LANL's Poisson Superfish at 10 kV peak dee voltage, a dummy dee (grounded bar) of 3/8-inch thickness gave satisfactorily low distortion of the accelerating field lines.
dummy dee thickness 3/8 in = 9.5 mmSource quote & editorial note
A peak DEE voltage of 10kV was chosen. First the ion source was not included as to see the distortion in the field lines due to the DEE-Dummy DEE asymmetry. The distortion is satisfactorily low with a dummy DEE of 3/8-inch thickness.
Koeth, Rutgers 12 Inch Cyclotron Ion Source Studies: Part I (2006) — p. 2
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Supports the single-dee/dummy-dee topology at the reference machine's scale: a ~10 mm grounded bar is a proven starting geometry that frees chamber space - re-run the electrostatic model for a new machine's own dee, gap and pole geometry.
-
MIT's measured beam envelope: width limited by the dees' internal aperture out to about one-third of final radius, then narrowing nearly linearly to the exit slit - their amplitudes damping from 0.8 in initially to ~0.1 in at the slit.
adiabatic damping (n^(-1/4)-class) is the standard interpretation; MIT's measured center-to-exit damping factor ~0.12Source quote & editorial note
the beam width was found to be limited by the internal aperture of the D's out to about one-third of the final radius and then to narrow in a nearly linear fashion out to the exit slit.
Livingston & Blewett, Particle Accelerators (1962) — p. 163-167
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Give the first third of radius generous vertical aperture - that is where the envelope filled the dee aperture on MIT's machine - and let the outer region run tighter, which also helps RF economy. Confirm on the actual machine (witness strips, dg-695) rather than assuming the same profile.
-
Use graphite for arc bodies, cones, and dee feelers near the source - it runs hot with minimal sputtering and evaporation; feeler extensions ('auspullers') on the dee faces opposite the source have been used to improve beam intensity - they decrease the physical spacings, raise the electric field at the source, and change the first electric lens's dimensions and focal properties.
Source quote & editorial note
Graphite is coming into wide use for cones, arc bodies, and also for D feelers or accelerating electrodes; it operates at high temperatures with a minimum of sputtering or evaporation. ... Extensions on the D faces opposite the source, called 'feelers' or 'auspullers,' have been used to improve beam intensity; they decrease the physical spacings and increase the electric field at the source. They also change the dimensions and focal properties of this first electric lens.
Livingston & Blewett, Particle Accelerators (1962) — p. 166-178
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Graphite source parts run hot without spraying metal; a feeler on the dee edge is a cheap first-turn-capture upgrade with historical standing - though even the source notes quantitative evidence on its focusing effect was thin, so tune it empirically.
-
There is no magnetic vertical focusing at the machine center (n=0 by symmetry); the first turns survive because the dee-gap electric field acts as an electrostatic immersion lens - so central-region electrode geometry and RF phase matter most in the first few turns.
n(r) ~ r^2 near center -> no magnetic focusing at r=0; gap E-field provides focusing, modified by transit timeSource quote & editorial note
There is no vertical magnetic focusing at the center of the magnet. By a fortunate coincidence, electrostatic focusing by the accelerating fields is effective for low-energy ions.
Humphries, Principles of Charged Particle Acceleration (1986) — p. 524, 526
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Explains why source-to-dee geometry (chimney position, puller gap, aperture height) dominates beam capture on small machines: at the center magnetic vertical focusing vanishes and only builds as n grows off zero with radius, so the electric gap lens is what the first turn or two get. Central-region electrode design is where capture is won on the documented machines.
-
Particulate contamination on the cathode dominated vacuum breakdown in this test: at the source's 95 MV/m maximum field, 40 of 52 particle-contaminated sites broke down against 1 of 16 clean sites - strong enough association to make cleanliness a first-order control, though material, conditioning and geometry still matter.
at 95 MV/m (source's figure): contaminated sites 40/52 broke down vs clean 1/16Source quote & editorial note
most uncontaminated cathode sites did not break down at 95MV/m (figure 4.8). Excluding the two sites for which tests were halted prematurely (as explained in the caption of figure 4.8), 40 of 52 contaminated sites broke down, while only 1 of 16 uncontaminated sites broke down at or below the maximum field
Werner, Probing and Modeling Voltage Breakdown in Vacuum — Cornell dissertation (2004) — p. 78
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A big lever on the reference machine's dee-voltage ceiling: gloves, solvent cleaning, and dust-free assembly of dee and stem are cheap holdoff - one major control among several, not a guarantee.
-
Practical vacuum-gap breakdown fields span 5-200 MV/m, and smaller gaps withstand higher fields: in the source's data, fields above 100 MV/m were reached only with gaps under 150 microns - so do not credit millimeter-scale gaps with those numbers.
breakdown range 5-200 MV/m; >100 MV/m observed only at gaps < 150 umSource quote & editorial note
breakdown occurs between 5 and 200 MV/m ... In general, smaller gaps can withstand higher fields. ... Note that cathodes can reach fields higher than 100 MV/m, but, observing the maximum voltage, only with a gap smaller than 150 microns
Werner, Probing and Modeling Voltage Breakdown in Vacuum — Cornell dissertation (2004) — p. 78, 95
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: At 13 kV across the reference machine's ~6 mm gap the mean field is ~2 MV/m, comfortably low - but mean field is only the first check. Local enhancement at edges and asperities, particles, insulator surfaces and gas pressure can still start an arc, so treat sparking there as a diagnostic checklist, not an impossibility.
-
Spark conditioning has a physical basis: in the early-processing regime each breakdown is overwhelmingly likely to raise that cathode site's breakdown field (successive/previous ratio > 1), with gains shrinking toward a saturation field.
E_breakdown(n+1)/E_breakdown(n) > 1 in early processing; gains shrink toward a saturation fieldSource quote & editorial note
In the 'early processing' regime, breakdown is overwhelmingly likely to increase the breakdown field of a cathode site.
Werner, Probing and Modeling Voltage Breakdown in Vacuum — Cornell dissertation (2004) — p. 91-92
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Ramp the next machine's dee voltage slowly and accept the limited, current-limited micro-discharges that come with first processing - that conditioning is what raises the ceiling. Deliberately provoking arcs as 'cleaning' is a different matter: arcs can damage electrodes and insulators, and current limiting does not control the stored-energy delivery into the fault (dg-285). Let conditioning happen; do not manufacture it.
-
Insulate the dee support stem by slipping a glass (pyrex) sleeve completely over it from the dee edge to at least 2 inches beyond the vacuum seal.
insulating sleeve extends >= 2 in beyond the sealSource quote & editorial note
slipping a 1/4 in. pyrex tube completely over the 3/16 in. copper dee support rod from the dee edge to at least 2 inches beyond the seal
Wouters, General Recommendations for Design of Small Cyclotrons — UCRL-476 (1949) — p. 7
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The cited machine's construction: a continuous Pyrex sleeve over the dee support rod, extending well past the seal for creepage. For a new machine, design stem insulation from peak RF voltage, surface-flashover behavior and the sleeve-to-stem annulus (sealed or vented?) rather than copying the geometry - and note glass sleeves bring their own charging and thermal-stress habits under RF.
-
Round every high-voltage edge and check it against Emax = 0.9V/(r*ln((r+a)/r)); the Rutgers team used 290 kV/inch as their aluminum design figure and chose a 0.1875-in minimum edge radius to keep the peak field at 170 kV/inch, about 60% of it.
Emax = 0.9V/(r*ln((r+a)/r)); source team's Al design figure 290 kV/in; their r_min = 0.1875 in -> 170 kV/inSource quote & editorial note
Aluminum=290 kV/inch ... We settled on a minimum radius of R=.1875 inches ... Emax=170 kV/inch
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The method transfers to 5-13 kV dees: radius all dee and stem edges and check the enhanced field with the formula. The 290 kV/in is one team's design number, not a material constant - vacuum holdoff moves with gap, finish, contamination and conditioning - so copy their margin practice (peak field well under the adopted figure), not their number.
-
Support the dee against the dummy dee with machinable-ceramic spacer strips - Houghton used four, ~2.53 x 0.77 x 0.18 cm, setting a 0.635 cm acceleration gap - after a discharge from the dee to the chamber wall damaged the earlier glass insulation.
gap = 0.635 cm; 4 ceramic strips 2.53 x 0.77 x 0.18 cmSource quote & editorial note
a discharge from the dee to the chamber wall damaged the glass insulation and 'dee' electrode ... Four machinable ceramic strips, each roughly 2.53 cm long, 0.77 cm wide and 0.18 cm thick, hold the two dees together at the appropriate separation gap of 0.635 cm.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Machinable ceramic (Macor-class) spacers are the pattern to copy for the reference machine's dee-to-dummy-dee gap; ceramics still flash over and track, so verify surface-field and creepage margins for the actual gap and voltage rather than treating the material as spark-proof.
-
Design the chamber, dee, dummy dee and filament to disassemble with screws rather than glue or solder - the 2006 Houghton chamber's glued glass insulation could not be repaired after a dee-to-wall spark, forcing a complete rebuild.
Source quote & editorial note
This design strategy made it impossible to fix a single component of the apparatus, such as the insulation, without replacing the entire piece.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A next machine should assume sparks and insulator damage happen across a machine's life: modular fastening where practical turns rebuilds into part swaps - the source's glued chamber is the cautionary case. Where glue or solder is structurally necessary, design the bonded assembly itself as the replaceable unit.
-
Vent every blind screw hole in the dee - Houghton drilled a small side hole into each with a No. 55 drill bit - so trapped air and water don't slowly outgas into the vacuum.
No. 55 drill (~1.3 mm) side vent per screw holeSource quote & editorial note
To vent the screw holes, a small hole was drilled in the side of each screw hole using a No. 55 drill bit. The screw holes need to be vented so that they do not trap air or water and slowly outgas when the dee is placed in the vacuum chamber.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Directly applicable to any screwed-together dee: unvented blind holes are virtual leaks that slow pumpdown and add residual gas load - size and place vents for conductance and cleaning access.
Cited in: The Vacuum Budget of a Cyclotron
-
Insulate the filament (1-3 V DC) from the dee, which sits at 1-2 kV RF in this machine class, with a ~0.18 cm machinable ceramic plate; barrel connectors epoxied to the ceramic carry the leads.
dee RF 1-2 kV vs filament 1-3 V; 0.18 cm ceramic insulatorSource quote & editorial note
the RF voltage on the dee is typically between 1 and 2 kV, far greater than the 1-3 V DC placed across the filament. Thus, the filament and wires must be adequately insulated from the dee ... Insulation was supplied by a 2.33 cm by 2.71 cm machinable ceramic rectangle approximately 0.18 cm thick. ... Two barrel connectors, each 1.28 cm long and 0.32 cm in diameter, were glued to the ceramic insulator using Hysol Loctite 1C vacuum epoxy
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Matches the reference machine's ~1.3 kV operating point today. At the planned 5-13 kV, do not just scale the creepage proportionally: reassess peak field and vacuum surface flashover for the actual geometry and check the feedthrough's rating.
-
Build the Dee/dummy-Dee pair from one 1.27 cm thick, 0.6 cm wide aluminium ring of 15.6 cm OD, cut into a 7.8 cm Dee and a 3.2 cm dummy Dee separated by 0.635 cm ceramic spacers, skinned with 0.13 cm sheet and supported on three KF-16 feedthroughs at 120 degrees.
ring 15.6 cm OD, 1.27 cm thick; Dee 7.8 cm wide, dummy 3.2 cm; accelerating gap 0.635 cm; skins 0.13 cm; 3 supports at 120 degSource quote & editorial note
Ceramic spacers hold the Dee and Dummy Dee apart with a gap of 0.635 cm. The entire Dee electrode assembly is supported by three KF-16 electrical feedthroughs through ports at 120 degrees from each other. ... A circular ring of 6061 T6 aluminium, 1.27 cm thick, 0.6 cm wide, and 15.6 cm outside diameter, formed the walls for both the Dee and Dummy Dee. Two 5052 aluminium sheets, 0.13 cm thick, were fastened to the top and bottom of the ring with vented screws.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Direct fabrication prior art at exactly tabletop scale; the single-Dee-plus-dummy topology needs live RF on only one electrode - the design rationale for fewer HV feedthroughs - and the vented screws are the kind of vacuum detail worth copying wholesale.
-
Electric-field defocusing near the center loses roughly 90% of starting ions to the dee surfaces; reduce the loss by raising dee voltage so ions make fewer turns and accumulate less phase shift.
higher V_dee -> fewer turns -> smaller phase slip and center lossSource quote & editorial note
some 90% of the initial supply of ions are lost to the dee surfaces. The loss may be reduced by increasing the dee voltage, thus reducing the number of turns an ion makes
Livingston & Boch, The Oak Ridge 86-Inch Cyclotron — ORNL-1196, OSTI 4357145 (1952) — p. 18
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Directly applicable: at 1.3 kV the reference machine's protons make many turns, and the quoted machine cut its central losses with more dee volts. A strong transmission lever - alongside central-region geometry (dg-348), which shapes what the first turns even see; measure which binds before spending (dg-303).
-
The historical design furnace-brazed five loops of flattened 7/8-in copper tubing to 1/8-in copper dee sides; both cooled designs proved satisfactory, and the brazed-tubing one was much easier and less expensive.
Source quote & editorial note
The sides of the second set of dees are 1/8 in. copper with five loops of 7/8 in. copper tubing flattened and furnace brazed ... Both designs have proved satisfactory but the latter is much easier and less expensive.
Livingston & Boch, The Oak Ridge 86-Inch Cyclotron — ORNL-1196, OSTI 4357145 (1952) — p. 50
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: At 1.3 kV and tens of RF watts the builder probably needs no water - but decide from computed or measured dissipation and temperature, not from voltage. If a next machine's dee runs kilowatt-class RF, brazed-on flattened tubing is the historically cheap construction; substituting soft solder needs its own validation (joint temperature, strength, vacuum compatibility).
-
Perforate the peripheral walls of dees and liner so the dee interior pumps fast, and face surfaces the stray beam can strike with graphite to protect copper and limit induced radioactivity.
Source quote & editorial note
The peripheral walls of the dees are perforated to permit high pumping speed. Graphite plates are attached to the inside of the dees ... to protect the copper from the stray proton beam.
Livingston & Boch, The Oak Ridge 86-Inch Cyclotron — ORNL-1196, OSTI 4357145 (1952) — p. 50, 7
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Perforation transfers directly - pressure inside an unvented dee can sit far above gauge pressure (the dee interior is a conductance-choked volume). Graphite armor earns its place wherever stray beam dwells, at ANY energy: heating, sputtering and erosion first (dg-426's material lesson), with activation reduction joining the list at higher energies.
Cited in: The Vacuum Budget of a Cyclotron
-
For maximum energy gain per turn, make the dee's RF angular size (geometric angle times harmonic h) 180 degrees or an odd multiple - where the |sin| factor peaks; energy gain per turn is dE = 2*N*q*U*|sin(h*dphi/2)|.
dE_turn = 2*N*q*U*|sin(h*dphi/2)|; |sin| = 1 at h*dphi = 180, 540, 900 deg (the sign alternation is a phase convention, absorbed into the synchronous phase); transit-time effects ride on topSource quote & editorial note
the maximum energy gain corresponds to a system in which the RF size of the dee is close to 180 degrees or is a multiple of 180 degrees with a factor of 3, 5, 7
Smirnov, The Cyclotron and Its Modeling — Phys. Part. Nuclei 52 (2021) — p. 11
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The reference machine's single ~180-degree dee on h=1 is already the optimum; the formula lets the builder tool compute turns-to-energy for any future dee angle or harmonic choice.
-
With a single dee at 60-70 kV, protons can reach 9-10 MeV in a decreasing-field classical cyclotron; energy scales with achievable energy gain per turn, so more turns cannot compensate a phase budget already spent.
1 dee, U = 60-70 kV -> E_final ~ 9-10 MeV (protons, decreasing field)Source quote & editorial note
in the presence of one accelerating dee and a voltage of 60-70 kV, protons can be accelerated in a decreasing magnetic field to an energy of 9-10 MeV
Smirnov, The Cyclotron and Its Modeling — Phys. Part. Nuclei 52 (2021) — p. 51
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Sets the scale, not a law: the quoted machine class pairs 60-70 kV with 9-10 MeV, and the reference machine's ~1.3 kV dee at ~150 keV sits consistently below that line. Final energy in a classical machine is phase-budget-limited (the summed slip, dg-273), which dee voltage relieves nonlinearly - compute the budget rather than scaling proportionally.
-
The cited design traces its central-region accelerating-gap voltage boundary at 1.3-1.4 times the Kilpatrick criterion f(MHz) = 1.64*E^2*exp(-8.5/E) (E in MV/m) - an empirical benchmark for RF vacuum gaps, not a guarantee.
Kilpatrick: f[MHz] = 1.64*E^2*exp(-8.5/E), E in MV/m; cited machine's adopted boundary: <= 1.3-1.4 x KilpatrickSource quote & editorial note
the common boundary of the maximum voltage in the accelerating gaps in the central region of the accelerator is traced, which is 1.3-1.4 times higher than the Kilpatrick criterion
Smirnov, The Cyclotron and Its Modeling — Phys. Part. Nuclei 52 (2021) — p. 57-58
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The right sizing framework if a next machine pushes dee voltage to tens of kV across small central-region gaps: compute the LOCAL peak surface field from the electrode geometry (not the average gap field), compare against Kilpatrick as a benchmark, and plan on conditioning and breakdown testing - margin is demonstrated, not assumed.
-
Internal-source extraction in Clark's survey: the anode/chimney is grounded and the dee's RF does the extraction via a puller or feeler, at 30-100 kV of RF on the full-size machines; his external sources run 10-30 kV DC with the anode biased positive.
internal PIG anode at ground; extraction field = dee RF via puller; 30-100 kV RF (big machines)Source quote & editorial note
Source extraction voltage is 10-30 kV dc for external sources, with the anode being biased positive. For internal sources, the anode is usually grounded and 30-100 kV of rf voltage is used for extraction
Clark, Ion Sources for Cyclotrons — Cyclotrons '81, Caen (1981) — p. PDF p.3 (printed p.233 of the 9th Int. Conf. on Cyclotrons proceedings)
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The reference machine extracts with its few-kV dee - far below the surveyed machines. Compensating with a small source-puller gap follows Child-Langmuir-like scaling (I ~ V^1.5/d^2 in the planar model - a guide in this geometry, not a law): documented small gaps run 2.3-2.9 mm (Siemens, K100 - dg-624), and expect proportionally lower current than published microamp figures until measured.
-
Puller geometry from the same source family: test-stand puller radius 12.7 mm with 5.0 mm minimum chimney-puller gap at 50 kV design voltage; the K100 medical cyclotron puller runs a 2.9 mm minimum gap (at ~20-40 kV RF), with the puller center deliberately offset 0.5 mm from the chimney center.
gap 5.0 mm at 50 kV; 2.9 mm (K100); offset 0.021" between chimney and puller centerlinesSource quote & editorial note
The chimney is centered at (0.000,0.000) and the puller is centered at (0.021,0.000). The minimum gap between the chimney and the puller is 2.9 mm while the gap at the source opening is 3.0 mm, meaning that the beam does not see the peak electric field. [K100 geometry]
Forringer, Phase Space Characterization of an Internal Ion Source for Cyclotrons — MSU dissertation (2004) — p. 78, 85
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Gap sets extraction field at fixed voltage, so at a few kV on the dee the chimney-puller gap must shrink below these machines' values to recover useful gradient - but there is no constant-kV-per-mm law to size it by (dg-419): pick a gap, then verify holdoff on the bench with the actual electrodes, finish and RF. The K100's deliberate 0.5 mm center offset - trading peak field at the beam for extraction optics - is the transferable design idea.
-
A chimney over a filament converts an open e-bombardment source into a column source: thermionic electrons travel the full chimney to the median plane, ions form in the whole column, and a small aperture (1/16", 1.6 mm) facing the dee releases them into the gap with field lines naturally matched to the first orbit.
chimney aperture 1/16" (1.6 mm) toward dee (Rutgers 12-inch)Source quote & editorial note
The inclusion of a chimney placed on top of the existing design will permit the thermionic electrons to travel to the median plane, thereby generating ions in the entire column. A small aperture, 1/16 of an inch in diameter, opening towards the DEE permits ions to be drawn into the accelerating field.
Koeth, Rutgers 12 Inch Cyclotron Ion Source Studies: Part I (2006) — p. 2-3
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The half-step option: chimney-over-filament keeps the reference machine's existing filament supply and adds gas confinement plus a defined 1.6 mm emission aperture. Injection matching to the first orbit remains its own design question (aperture position, puller, phase - dg-348), not an automatic property; a PIG chimney gets the same geometry benefits and deletes the filament, at the price of a new arc supply (dg-383).
-
Support the dee on insulating columns 'making it possible to provide a DC bias' - CIT's design summary planned 1000-2000 V (NYO-780 p.75).
dee DC bias 1000-2000 V (NYO-780 summary, p.75)Source quote & editorial note
It is supported on insulating columns, making it possible to provide a DC bias.
Creutz, Design and Construction of Synchro-Cyclotron — NYO-780 (1950) — p. 15
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A DC-isolated dee mount costs little at design time and provides the discharge-control knob the era's reports repeatedly reach for (dg-320, dg-680, dg-805). A kilovolt-class bias means the mount and its feed are HV-insulated by design, not as an afterthought.
-
Suppress high-frequency parasitic oscillator modes with resistive (light-bulb) loads inductively coupled to the tube lines, and kill an unwanted low mode with a series-resonant trap from dee to chamber.
Source quote & editorial note
Parasitic modes at higher frequencies than desired for proton acceleration were successfully eliminated with light-bulb loads inductively coupled to the tube lines, and the lower mode ... was avoided by means of a series resonant circuit from dee to vacuum chamber.
Creutz, Design and Construction of Synchro-Cyclotron — NYO-780 (1950) — p. 30
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The general methods transfer - coupled lossy loads to damp unwanted modes, and a tuned series trap for a specific mode - but not component values or topology: identify the actual unwanted modes of the LDMOS-driven resonator first, then design the damper/trap for the measured mode, checking its dissipation and its effect on the operating mode.
-
Size dee-to-ground vacuum clearance from RF voltage the way the 184-inch did: a 3-inch minimum at the hot open dee end for 50 kV RF, relaxing to 2 inches at the supported (low-voltage) end - informed by their bench result that a polished 0.080-inch copper gap held 50 kV at 13 Mc and ~5e-6 mm.
184-inch design points: 3 in at 50 kV (open end), 2 in (supported end); bench: 0.080 in polished Cu gap held 50 kV at 13 Mc, ~5e-6 mm - NOT a linear kV/inch lawSource quote & editorial note
the vacuum gap be sufficient to withstand 50 kilovolts rf at the accelerating gap. Consequently, a minimum of 3" spacing was employed in the vicinity of the open front end of the dee; near the rear end (i.e. supported end) a minimum of 2" was allowed. ... [a] 0.080" gap between copper or copper-plated surfaces having a reasonable polish would hold a maximum of 50 kilovolts at 13 mc at a pressure of about 5 x 10-6 mm
MacKenzie et al., Design of the Radio-Frequency System for the 184-inch Cyclotron — UCRL-64 (1948) — p. 10
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Do not scale these linearly: vacuum holdoff is nonlinear in gap and dominated by geometry, finish and conditioning (their own bench gap held the same 50 kV across 0.080 inch). Set a next machine's clearance by electrostatic analysis of the actual geometry with conservative peak-field limits, then prove it by conditioning at full voltage.
-
Qualify feedthrough/support insulators before installation on a resonant test line that develops full RF voltage from a small driver: the 184-inch group developed over 50 kV at 13 Mc across the insulator with a 5 kW oscillator, and found air-blast cooling necessary under the most severe tests.
Source quote & editorial note
Over 50 kilovolts rf could be developed across the insulator at 13 mc by a 5 kilowatt oscillator. Under the most severe test conditions, air blast cooling of the insulators was found necessary.
MacKenzie et al., Design of the Radio-Frequency System for the 184-inch Cyclotron — UCRL-64 (1948) — p. 13
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A bench resonator lets the builder soak-test dee-stem insulators at full 5-13 kV RF from modest drive - how modest depends on the fixture's measured loaded Q (constant-Q scaling of the cited point suggests tens of watts at 5 kV but hundreds at 13 kV), so measure Q and compute the drive rather than assuming it.
-
Budget vacuum RF gaps from bench data, then derate for surface roughening: an 0.080-inch polished copper gap held 50 kV at 13 Mc and 5e-6 mm on the bench (625 kV/in; 40 kV was the design value), while the discharge-roughened operating unit held ~30 kV over its 0.060-inch gap - 500 kV/in, about 20% lower in average field.
bench: 50 kV / 0.080 in = 625 kV/in (polished Cu, 5e-6 mm, 13 Mc); design ~80% of bench; roughened unit: 30 kV / 0.060 in = 500 kV/in (~20% field derate)Source quote & editorial note
a .080" gap between copper or copper-plated surfaces having a reasonable polish would hold a maximum of 50 kilovolts at 13 mc at a pressure of about 5 x 10-6 mm.
MacKenzie et al., Design of the Radio-Frequency System for the 184-inch Cyclotron — UCRL-64 (1948) — p. 13
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Directly applicable breakdown data for setting a next machine's dee-to-liner and puller gaps at 5-13 kV - with the derate compared in FIELD, not voltage (the two units had different gaps), and remembering vacuum RF hold-off does not scale as fixed kV-per-gap: bench-verify the actual geometry (dg-419).
-
Bring cooling water to electrodes at RF or DC bias potential through several-foot lengths of flexible insulating (polyethylene) tubing carrying treated low-conductivity water.
Source quote & editorial note
The water circuit is completed to ground potential by means of sets of flexible polyethylene tubing, each several feet long. Treated water of low conductivity is used.
MacKenzie et al., Design of the Radio-Frequency System for the 184-inch Cyclotron — UCRL-64 (1948) — p. 13
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Applicable if the next machine's dee or stem is water-cooled while biased - but hose length plus DI water is the historical arrangement, not a sufficiency proof: calculate the water-column resistance at worst-case conductivity (DI water degrades in service - monitor it), include RF capacitive current through the column, and ground/interlock accordingly.
-
Determine transmission-line lengths, effective dee capacitance, and RF power on a scale model of the complete resonant system before construction: quarter scale means frequency x4, all L and C divided by 4, and — as the report's stated consequences of that scaling choice, not measured model results — power x2 and Q x 1/2 for equal voltage. The measured comparison is effective dee capacitance well below static: 500 vs 1600 uuF. [2026-09-06 erratum, scan re-read: the static capacitance is 1600 uuF, not 1000 pF, and the power/Q figures are scaling consequences, not measurements.]
1/n scale -> f x n, L and C / n; stated consequences: power x2, Q x 1/2 for equal voltage; measured: effective 500 uuF vs 1600 uuF staticSource quote & editorial note
For reasons of convenience, a quarter scale was chosen. The resonant frequency is then increased fourfold and all inductances and capacitances are reduced by a factor of four.
MacKenzie et al., Design of the Radio-Frequency System for the 184-inch Cyclotron — UCRL-64 (1948) — p. 14
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Transferable method: prototype a next machine's resonator at reduced scale with a VNA - remembering effective dee capacitance is not the static value, which is exactly what the model run is for.
-
Cure resonant-electron/multipactor discharges in large volumes around the dee by cutting down the free volume with perforated grounded shields, adding a grounded dummy dee, and applying negative DC bias to the dee.
Source quote & editorial note
All discharges were eliminated by cutting down the available volume by means of perforated shields around the sides of the dee, by adding a grounded dummy dee and by applying a negative bias to the dee.
MacKenzie et al., Design of the Radio-Frequency System for the 184-inch Cyclotron — UCRL-64 (1948) — p. 23
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Directly applicable - the 1948 combination that cleared THAT machine's discharges: reduced free volume (perforated shields preserve pumping speed), a grounded dummy dee, and negative dee bias. On a new machine, apply the elements as diagnosis suggests (dg-1273's discrimination between multipactor and gas discharge) rather than as one obligatory bundle - though all three are cheap to design in from the start.
-
In the 184-inch rotary-condenser geometry there was sufficient magnetic field to allow a Philips-gauge (Penning) discharge when positive bias was applied, so negative bias was imperative there - magnetic field threading an RF gap can sustain a Penning discharge with the wrong bias polarity.
Source quote & editorial note
There is sufficient magnetic field at the rotary condenser to allow a Philips gauge discharge when positive bias is applied; a negative bias is therefore imperative.
MacKenzie et al., Design of the Radio-Frequency System for the 184-inch Cyclotron — UCRL-64 (1948) — p. 23
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The next machine's dee sits in 0.59 T, so if a DC bias is used to kill discharges, start negative on the strength of this precedent - then verify empirically: whether a Penning discharge ignites depends on the E/B geometry and pressure, not the field alone.
-
Mount brittle ceramic insulators so they carry only pure tension or pure compression, never shear: the 184-inch put its upper two dee insulators in pure compression and lower two in pure tension, and after a year of service with no trouble whatever - despite fragility in shear evident at assembly - judged the care 'thus well justified'.
Source quote & editorial note
the upper two insulators are under pure compression, the lower two under pure tension. ... The rf insulators have given no trouble whatever since installation one year ago, though at the time of assembly, their fragility was evidenced insofar as shear forces were concerned. The care taken in insuring that only pure tension and compression forces would be applied was thus well justified.
MacKenzie et al., Design of the Radio-Frequency System for the 184-inch Cyclotron — UCRL-64 (1948) — p. 24
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Directly applicable to a next machine's dee-stem standoffs and feedthroughs: arrange the support geometry (threaded rods, spherical seats) so ceramics never see bending or shear - prefer compression where practicable, avoid point loading, and respect the manufacturer's tensile rating, which is far below the compressive one.
-
Calibrate dee-voltage-per-watt expectations from this report's machine: its oscillator produced 15 kV peak on the dee at 10 Mc (9 kV at 20 Mc) for 6 kW input at ~70% average efficiency; the report elsewhere identifies the machine and tube complement (scan re-read queued for those details).
15 kV dee at 10 Mc for ~6 kW input, ~70% efficiency (37-inch dee, C ~ 300 pF)Source quote & editorial note
It would produce 15 kv peak volts on the dee at 10 me and 9 kv at 20 me with 6 kw input. It averages around 70%.
MacKenzie & Waithman, R.F. System for Frequency Modulated Cyclotron — MDDC-1045 (1946) — p. 4
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A benchmark near the reference machine's 9 MHz - and transferring it runs through the resonator parameters: scale by the actual dee capacitance and Q via dg-313's formula, not by watts-per-kV alone.
-
Expect an electron-oscillation discharge that lives only below an extinction voltage near 500 V RF and blocks voltage build-up even at 1e-5 mm Hg; the 37-inch eliminated it with a sweeping field - biasing the dee, transmission line and condenser stator a few hundred volts POSITIVE - and the bias, unexplained, roughly doubled their beam.
discharge sustained only below ~500 V RF (the source's extinction neighborhood); any sweeping field kills it - the 37-inch used a few hundred volts positive biasSource quote & editorial note
Above this voltage, which is in the neighborhood of 500 volts, the discharge is rapidly extinguished as electrons can no longer oscillate. However, the discharge is usually intense enough, even at 10-5 mm of Hg to prevent the voltage from building up to this extinction value. Such a discharge can be eliminated by a sweeping field obtained in any manner. The sweeping field was obtained on the 37-inch cyclotron by biasing the dee, transmission line, and condenser stator parts a few hundred volts positive.
MacKenzie & Waithman, R.F. System for Frequency Modulated Cyclotron — MDDC-1045 (1946) — p. 12
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The single most relevant discharge fact for the reference machine: its ~1.3 kV dee lives just above this regime, and the 5-13 kV upgrade must punch through it during every start - plan for a bias supply on the dee from day one, and note the source's polarity (positive on the 37-inch; dg-320's machine used negative - both worked, because any sweeping field defeats the resonance).
-
A few-hundred-volt positive dee/line bias doubled the 37-inch beam current for reasons then unexplained - worth one experiment, but only where no magnetic-field region can sustain a Penning discharge (the 184-inch later required negative bias).
Source quote & editorial note
For reasons which are not clearly understood this bias usually increases the size of the beam by a factor of two or more.
MacKenzie & Waithman, R.F. System for Frequency Modulated Cyclotron — MDDC-1045 (1946) — p. 12
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Conditionally applicable - and 'try both polarities' is a controlled test, not a knob: use an RF-rated bias network with proper isolation and discharge paths, current and arc monitoring, and vacuum interlocks, and assess Penning-discharge conditions (crossed E and B regions) before applying either polarity. The dee's RF stored energy does not care about the bias supply's current limit.
-
At n = 0.2 the coupling resonance omega_z = omega_r/2 converts radial oscillation energy into vertical oscillation at up to double the amplitude - and machines with low accelerating voltage (many turns per inch) build it up rapidly.
omega_r = sqrt(1-n)*omega_0, omega_z = sqrt(n)*omega_0; at n = 0.2, omega_z = omega_r/2 (the coupling resonance); the amplitude transferred depends on coupling strength and crossing speed - the doubling figure is the report's estimate for its machineSource quote & editorial note
It must be kept in mind for systems having low accelerating voltages similar to the 184-inch cyclotron, that the ions will rapidly increase the amplitude of their vertical oscillations at the point where n = 0.2.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The reference machine's few-kV dee means many turns near any resonance radius - the slow-crossing regime the quote warns about. Keep n below 0.2 over the whole usable radius (the mapped check, dg-138), and give the dee aperture real margin over the expected radial oscillation amplitude.
Cited in: Beam Dynamics: An Interactive Laboratory
-
Dee-to-dee voltage in the census tracks energy loosely: ISSP's 16-inch ran 10-18 kV and still held 100 uA internal beam; larger 1-4 MeV machines ran to ~30 kV (Stanford 20, Tokyo 27), and 7-11 MeV machines 40-90 kV.
Source quote & editorial note
Dee-to-dee, kv 10 - 18 ... Internal Beam, Stable, ua 100
Howard, Cyclotrons and High-Energy Accelerators, 1958 — ORNL-2644 (1958) — p. 61
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Proof that low dee voltage works at small radius: ISSP is the existence proof for a sub-MeV goal on a ~10 kV-class dee. Dee voltage buys turn count, phase budget and survival - the energy ceiling stays with B*r (dg-026) - and the field profile must keep the extra turns focused.
-
Census geometry ratios - the quoted 31-inch row computes to: pole gap 17.7% of pole diameter, dee aperture 59% of the gap, dee diameter 93.5% of pole diameter, maximum beam radius 81% of pole radius; the census's smaller machines bracket similar ratios (full tabulation: scan re-read queued).
Source quote & editorial note
Pole tip dia. 31 in. Beam radius, max 12.6 in. Field gap, center 5.5 in. ... Dee dia. 29 in. Dee aperture 3 1/4 in.
Howard, Cyclotrons and High-Energy Accelerators, 1958 — ORNL-2644 (1958) — p. 26
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Sanity template for a next machine on 8-inch poles: ratios of this class suggest a 1-1.4 in gap, a 0.5-0.8 in dee aperture, and energy planned at a 3.2-3.6 in beam radius rather than the pole edge - starting proportions to check against the machine's own field map and stability analysis, not expected dimensions.
-
Center the beam with slits on the first revolutions: ANU used beam-defining slits on turns 1, 2 and 3 (third-turn slit 0.5 mm) and reached 100% extraction efficiency at low current - but only with dee voltage stabilized better than 0.5%.
Source quote & editorial note
Beam defining slits used on 1, 2, and 3rd revolutions to define center of beam rotation; 3rd turn slit is 1/2 mm wide. 100% extraction efficiency with low beams, requires better than 1/2 % stabilization of dee volts.
Howard, Cyclotrons and High-Energy Accelerators, 1958 — ORNL-2644 (1958) — p. 27
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A historically successful, mechanically simple extraction aid: slits in the center region plus tight dee-amplitude regulation. Evaluate it for a next machine by comparing its interception losses and centering benefit against the calculated turn separation and deflector tolerances - slits select phase space by throwing beam away, so they complement, not replace, deflector design.
-
Vertical focusing on the first few turns can be electrostatic: ANU ran carbon grids across the dee apertures and reported electric focusing successful on the first four revolutions, bridging the region where the magnetic-gradient focusing is still negligible.
Source quote & editorial note
Electric focusing with carbon grids on the dees successful on first four revolutions
Howard, Cyclotrons and High-Energy Accelerators, 1958 — ORNL-2644 (1958) — p. 27
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: First-turn loss at low dee voltage is a classic tabletop failure mode, and the ANU carbon-grid result makes grid focusing worth testing - model the electric fields first, note a slit plate is not the same as a transparent grid, and check interception, RF loading, heating and outgassing at low current before adopting it.
-
The dee must be a high-Q energy-storage resonator, never a switched load: brute-force reversing a 100 pF dee-to-liner capacitance at 100 kV and 10 Mc/s would demand 20 MW, versus watts-to-kilowatts to sustain the same voltage in a resonant system.
P_switched ~ 2*C*V^2*f for hard +V/-V reversals - each reversal moves the stored charge through 2V, so the source's 20 MW = 2 x 1e-10 F x (1e5 V)^2 x 1e7 Hz checksSource quote & editorial note
If this is done at the rate of 10 megacycles per second, the power requirement would be 20 megawatts!
Goodman, A Square-Wave Cyclotron Oscillator — ORNL-2403 (1958) — p. 13
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The cleanest back-of-envelope argument in this collection for why dee voltage is bought with Q, not amplifier watts - scale it to a next machine (7-9.5 kV on tens of pF at 6.78 MHz) to show why a few hundred LDMOS watts suffice only through a good resonator.
-
To make one dee resonate simultaneously at the fundamental and third harmonic, terminate the dee capacitance in two shorted transmission-line stubs whose electrical lengths satisfy cot(a1 w) + b cot(a2 w) - ac w = 0 with w=1 and w=3 as roots; a coax bench model matched calculated lengths within about 2%.
cot(a1*w) + b*cot(a2*w) - ac*w = 0 with roots at w=1 and w=3; solving both conditions gives b13 = (cot(3*a1) - 3*cot(a1))/(3*cot(a2) - cot(3*a2)); a1 < pi/3 < a2Source quote & editorial note
The extra current element can, however, be a second transmission line
Goodman, A Square-Wave Cyclotron Oscillator — ORNL-2403 (1958) — p. 18
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A lumped-plus-stub version is buildable at tabletop scale and the design tables (PDF 33-60) are precomputed; even unused, the method shows how to place a resonator's higher modes deliberately instead of discovering them by accident.
-
In the cited independently-tuned two-dee system, unneutralized dee-to-dee capacitance coupled the two tuning servos so strongly that stability was, in the source's words, insuperable - power flows dee-to-dee through the high-Q resonator, and shielding skirts and time-constant tweaks did not fix it; transmission-line neutralization between the stems did.
dee-dee neutralizing line load condition Vn = Va*w*CDD*Zo*sin(beta*l)Source quote & editorial note
The most serious objection to the dee-to-dee capacitance is the coupling between servo systems which it provides. The problem of servo stability becomes insuperable.
Smith, A Three-Phase Radiofrequency System for Cloverleaf Cyclotrons — UCRL-3153 (1955) — p. 15
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A single-dee next machine dodges the coupled-servo problem entirely - the design lesson. Any two-dee or dee-plus-tuned-dummy variant with separate tuners should measure the coupling matrix and analyze loop stability first: neutralizing lines are one narrowband remedy, and common tuning, coordinated (MIMO) control or reduced bandwidth are others.
-
Expect thermal detuning plus ion lock after shutting down from high-power running: this machine would not re-excite, and had to be retuned by exciting each dee-stem tank with a grid dip oscillator and adjusting the tuning capacitances for resonance.
Source quote & editorial note
thermal effects detuned the machine sufficiently so that ion lock prevented the rf from being restored ... It was then necessary to retune the machine by exciting each of the dee-stem tanks with a grid dip oscillator and adjusting the tuning capacitances for resonance.
Heusinkveld et al., Studies with a Three-Dee Three-Phase Proton Cyclotron — UCRL-3187 (1955) — p. 12
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The transferable practice is a permanent low-level resonance-check capability - a VNA or dip meter on a pickup loop, with RF-rated isolation or interlocking so it can never see drive power - so resonance can be found cold, plus logging tune position vs temperature. The reference machine already shows warm-up drift.
-
Vertical beat-frequency loss is the destructive dual of rf extraction: when the source's resonance relation holds AND a vertical electric field proportional to the vertical displacement exists, the axial equation of motion is absolutely unstable - in the 184-inch, even the weak vertical component of the accelerating voltage lost the beam impressively fast.
two conditions per source: its Eq. resonance relation (displayed equation not OCR-readable - scan re-read queued for the exact form) + E_z proportional to z -> absolute axial instabilitySource quote & editorial note
f_z = f - f_0, where f_z equals (sqrt n) f_0 ... and n is the conventional cyclotron magnetic field parameter. The relation f = f_0 ((sqrt n) + 1) is one required condition for this process to occur
Stubbins, Radiofrequency System for Extracting Particles from a Cyclotron — UCRL-8578 (1958) — p. PDF p.5 = printed p.-3- (UCRL-8578, Sec. I Introduction)
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A real design caution at any scale: an E_z gradient of the right symmetry near a nu_z resonance can dump the beam. Note dee misalignment gives mostly a dipole-like midplane E_z, not the z-proportional gradient this parametric resonance needs - but asymmetric liners and gap geometry can supply the gradient term, so keep the dee/dummy-dee vertically symmetric and check nu_z against strong rf harmonics at operating field.
-
Condition the RF system past its working dee voltage and hold it there: the 63-inch reached 75 kV dee-to-dee under vacuum after routine difficulties and then maintained it for long periods without tendencies to failure - sustained hold, not a momentary peak, was what let them call the RF solved.
acceptance pattern: sustained hold above working voltage under vacuum; the cited 75 kV is that machine's demonstrated pointSource quote & editorial note
A dee voltage of 75 kv dee-to-dee was reached after some routine difficulties were overcome. The cyclotron now maintains this voltage for long periods of time without showing any tendencies to failure.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The transferable practice is endurance-above-operating-point as the acceptance test for the LDMOS upgrade - with the margin chosen from the new system's own component deratings (capacitors, feedthroughs, transistor SOA), stored energy and interlocks, and with arc and X-ray monitoring during the test. A margin that survives only seconds is not margin; a margin that exceeds a component rating is not a test, it is a failure in progress.
-
Negative dee bias can substitute weakly for an accelerating slit: on the 22-inch, increased (negative) dee bias raised full-radius beam by up to 30%, but only with no accelerating slit mounted - ORNL reports the effect 'is not observable when an accelerating slit is used'. [Corrected 2026-08-23: the earlier rule also said the slit 'outperforms the optimum bias'; the source shows the two are not additive, not that one beats the other. The sign of the bias and the with-slit null are on the cited page, just outside the quote - ORNL-1339 p. 16: 'This effect is not observable when an accelerating slit is used' and 'the increased negative bias potential gives non-optimum-phased ions ... a deeper penetration into the rf electric field'.]
Source quote & editorial note
an increase in bias potential on the dees increases the beam accelerated to maximum radius by a factor of as much as 30% when the cyclotron is operated without an accelerating slit (rf) mounted on the dee.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Worth a cheap experiment on the reference machine - with a proper RF-rated bias-injection network (choke/filter, insulation, supply protection), never a bare DC supply on a live dee. ORNL's stated reading is that bias pulls badly-phased ions deeper into the gap field; with a slit installed they saw no bias effect. The source does not rank the two approaches - test both on the actual machine.
-
Apply a small negative DC bias (1-2 kV on the 63-inch) to the dees while RF oscillation is being established, to sweep out ions formed during startup and prevent them loading or destabilizing the rising RF.
dee bias -1 to -2 kV on the 63-inch's ~50 kV dees (2-4% of dee voltage) during RF establishmentSource quote & editorial note
A negative voltage bias, 1 to 2 kv, is applied to the dees in order to sweep out any ions that may be formed while oscillation is being established.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Transferable as a startup practice: a bias supply that sweeps ions out during RF ramp-up is the classical cure for start-up loading (dg-320, dg-680 - polarity differs by machine and both worked). What voltage a small machine needs is found at the machine; the 63-inch's 2-4% of dee voltage is the documented anchor, not a scaling law.
-
Fit carbon lips to dee edges where sparking limits voltage: installed on the 86-inch, in a new design, to reduce sparking at the increased 400-500 kV dee-to-dee voltage.
Source quote & editorial note
Carbon lips of a new design were installed on the edges of the dees to reduce sparking at the increased dee-to-dee voltage, 400-500 kv, required for operation at the high energy level.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The 400-500 kV is MW-era and does not transfer; the material practice is a candidate to test - if the reference machine's 5-13 kV upgrade sparks at the dee gap, carbon edge pieces are the period remedy and trivially machinable. Verify grade choice and watch for carbon dust on insulators; and note ucrl-10654's caveat that carbon loses its bake-in minutes after voltage-off (dg-744).
-
Central-region orbit centering couples source radial position to dee voltage: with the Davis axial source confined to r < 2.5 in, the machine is forced to comparatively low dee voltages (20-30 kV) so the first-turn radius matches the available source position and the orbits stay centered — dee voltage is set by geometry, not by available RF power.
first-gap geometry couples V_dee to source/puller radius: r_1 = sqrt(2*m*q*V_gap)/(q*B) for acceleration from rest through the gap potential - initial energy and RF phase correct it furtherSource quote & editorial note
the ion source position is limited to a maximum radius of 2.5 inches. This forces operation at comparatively low dee voltages (20-30 kv) in order to center the orbits.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The design logic transfers directly to a next machine's central-region layout: pick dee voltage and source-puller radius TOGETHER from the first-orbit geometry. It also cuts the other way for the reference machine's 5-13 kV upgrade: raising dee voltage moves the optimum source position outward — re-scan source position after the RF upgrade.
-
Give enclosed RF volumes their own analyzed pumping paths, in parallel with the dee-mouth opening - the source treats added openings at the dee as pumping speed in parallel with the mouth.
Source quote & editorial note
This additional pumping speed then can be considered as being in parallel with that through the opening at the mouth of the dee.
Foss et al., Cyclotron Component Design Technical Reports — TID-454 (1952) — p. 129
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Dees are pumping dead-ends by construction, and the ion source dumps its gas inside one: added holes in the dee back or stem shrouds are valuable conductance exactly there - size and place each pattern with an RF-current and field review, a structural check, and a molecular-flow conductance estimate; below-RF-significant hole size is the starting constraint, not the whole analysis.
Cited in: The Vacuum Budget of a Cyclotron
-
Build and run a scale model of the RF system before committing to the full assembly: the report's 3/4-scale oscillator program delivered the dee-voltage-vs-frequency curve, the tuning-capacity range and drive-power data, and the quoted 27% efficiency measurement that changed the final design to six type-880 tubes while power-supply capacity allowed it.
model resonant frequencies ~ 1/scale (their 3/4-scale limits were 5% high for the scale factor used)Source quote & editorial note
Fig. 6.3-Typical characteristics of three-fourths scale model ... 150-kw input, 27.5-kw plate dissipation per tube ... The fairly low efficiency, 27 per cent, indicates that it would be desirable to go to six type-880 tubes in the final model
Foss et al., Cyclotron Component Design Technical Reports — TID-454 (1952) — p. PDF p.162 (unnumbered chapter opener, Technical Report No. 6) for the quoted text; the figure is on PDF p.167 = printed p.167
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The transferable method rule - prototype the next machine's dee/stem/liner as a cheap scale model (or full-scale mockup, given the small size) and measure resonance, Q and parasitics before final fabrication; NYO-780 p.29ff records the same practice. Cite both.
-
Hunt parasitic RF modes early and kill them selectively: the report identified an unwanted ~50 Mc mode on its three-quarter-scale model - the oscillator stub forming a capacity-loaded half-wave line - and loaded it with a small coupling loop tuned to the parasite.
Source quote & editorial note
equipped with a small coupling loop ... used to load the unwanted mode, which on the three-fourths scale model was about 50 megacycles, in which the oscillator stub forms a capacity-loaded half-wavelength line.
Foss et al., Cyclotron Component Design Technical Reports — TID-454 (1952) — p. 162
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Both steps are amateur-accessible: find candidate modes cheaply (a scale model or a bench sweep of the real resonator), then load the parasite selectively into a lossy element that leaves the wanted mode alone. Scaling shifts parasitic frequencies, and the final amplifier's loading shifts them again - so verify and re-suppress on the fully assembled system; that matters the moment the LDMOS upgrade raises the reference machine's gap voltages.
-
Check dee-voltage clearances OUTSIDE the vacuum tank too: the ORNL ion-source testing unit's dee voltage was expected to be capped not by in-vacuum gaps but by a 1.5-in dee-stem spacing in air outside the tank.
Source quote & editorial note
The dee voltage will undoubtedly be limited, though, by the spacing between the dee stems outside the vacuum tank, which is only 1.5" at one point
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: For the LDMOS upgrade toward 5-13 kV dees, walk the whole RF path on BOTH sides of the wall - feedthroughs, stem gaps in air, coupling hardware, creepage across insulator surfaces, and the vacuum-side gaps and multipactor windows - and let field analysis, ratings and conditioning tests say which limit binds first; the cited machine's air-side cap is one historical outcome, not a law.
-
Insulate the entire dee system from ground so a dc bias can be applied to control ion loading — designed into the rebuilt 44-inch from the start (and already proven on the 22-inch: ornl-1339 measured accelerated-beam gains from dee bias; ornl-1269's Fig. 12 ran 600 V bias).
Source quote & editorial note
The whole dee system is insulated from ground so that a bias potential may be applied to control ion loading.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The reference machine already uses dee bias; the design rule for a next machine is to make bias a first-class requirement - insulate the dee-stem support (see the ornl-1884 cantilever-on-insulators execution) rather than retrofitting isolation later.
-
High dee voltage buys its clearance out of the magnet gap: to run 100 kV, ORNL removed the flat shims from the tank, accepting a wider 13.5-in. gap (and the field cost that implies) — dee-voltage ambition, aperture, and gap trade against each other and must be budgeted together (44-inch cyclotron).
Source quote & editorial note
The removal of the flat shims from the tank increased the magnet gap to 13 1/2 in. and provides sufficient clearance to permit operation of the dees at a potential of 100 kv.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: For a next machine the same ledger applies at 5-13 kV: dee-to-liner spark distance plus dee aperture plus liner clearances must fit inside the gap, and gap given to voltage clearance is field taken from energy - in the gap-dominated, fixed-ampere-turn regime (dg-021's measured caveat on the ideal scaling). Decide voltage and gap together (dg-181).
-
Design water-cooled dees so the cooling circuit is reachable: leaks in the 44-inch dees' internal water tubes sat in 'very inaccessible locations' and delayed final assembly - repair required cutting windows through the dee sides, then closing them by Heliarc welding.
Source quote & editorial note
several leaks in very inaccessible locations have delayed final assembly. In order to repair the leaks in the internal water-cooling tubes it was necessary to cut windows through the sides of the dees. The windows were then closed by Heliarc welding.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: If a next machine's dees carry water: treat internal cooling leakage as a credible failure and route tubing so joints and runs can be reached (or provide removable covers) where RF and vacuum allow; pressure-test the dee as a unit BEFORE it meets the liner; and note the historical recovery mode - cut a window, fix, reweld - is documented practice worth keeping in the back pocket.
-
The ORNL 44-inch cantilevered the whole dee system from a mounting at the outer end of the dee stems, supported on insulators to permit applying a bias potential to the dees - one support plane carrying the entire resonant structure.
Source quote & editorial note
The whole dee system is supported by a cantilever mounting at the outer end of the dee stems. This mounting is supported on insulators in order to permit the application of a bias potential to the dees.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: An attractive pattern for a next machine: one stiff cantilevered dee-stem mount outside the field region, isolated for DC bias, is mechanically simpler than distributed insulated supports. Design the RF side separately - insulating the mount enables bias but does not by itself define the RF return path, so engineer the ground plane, bypassing and bias feed network explicitly, and check insulator loading and flashover.
-
The 48-inch conversion spec set design dee-to-dee voltage at 200 kV against a 110-kV threshold for N5+ - a factor of about 1.8 over threshold.
V_design / V_threshold ~ 200/110 ~ 1.8Source quote & editorial note
Dee-to-dee r-f voltage (design), kv 200; Threshold voltage for N5+, kv 110 (Table 3, condensed)
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Margin philosophy consistent with the 63-inch's 75-vs-60 kV acceptance hold (ornl-1339): documented machines bought well over threshold. For the LDMOS upgrade, compute the threshold dee voltage for the intended turn count and buy real headroom - documented precedents cluster around 1.3-2x. What the margin purchases (orbit count, loading headroom, species reach) is the editorial reading, not the table's statement.
-
Three parasitics set a dee system's resonant range and deserve first attention: the capacity presented to the dee by the dummy dee, the minimum capacity of the tuning element, and the inductance at the dee throat (stem junction). Reducing any one raises the frequency.
Source quote & editorial note
These were the capacity presented to the dee by the dummy dee, the minimum capacity of the rotor, and the inductance at the throat of the dee.
Anderson, Half-Scale Model Tests on the Three Quarter Wave R.F. System — UCRL-31 (1947) — p. 10
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Direct checklist for why a tank on the reference machine or a next machine does not resonate where the lumped-element estimate says — dummy-dee proximity, feedthrough/trimmer minimum C, and stem-to-dee transition inductance are the three knobs.
-
Tune with every electrode in place: inserting the dummy dee alone dropped the model's upper frequency limit from 48.8 to 44.5 mc and the lower from 19.9 to 18.8 mc — a ~9% detuning from one grounded electrode. A resonance measured on a bare dee is not the operating frequency.
dummy-dee insertion alone: -9% on the upper limit (48.8 -> 44.5 mc)Source quote & editorial note
the insertion of the dummy dee had dropped the upper frequency limit from 48.8 to 44.5 mc, and the lower limit from 19.9 to 18.8 mc
Anderson, Half-Scale Model Tests on the Three Quarter Wave R.F. System — UCRL-31 (1947) — p. 9
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Final RF tuning of a next machine's cavity must be done with dummy dee, source structure, and probes installed - the model's single grounded dummy dee moved the band edges ~9%, and each added structure perturbs by its own amount: measure or simulate the shift for the actual geometry rather than budgeting any particular percentage in advance.
-
Keep a two-sided trim toolkit for a cavity that lands off-frequency: a shorted stub (shorter than lambda/4 at the operating frequency, hence inductive) attached to the dee RAISES resonance; added dee-to-liner capacity plates LOWER it. The source's measured costs: stubs +3 Mc for +25% drive power; 200 uuf of plates -1 Mc for +5% power.
shorted stub < lambda/4 acts inductive, raises f (here 47 -> 50 mc, +25% power); added C lowers f (200 uuf: 19.5 -> 18.5 mc, +5% power)Source quote & editorial note
a shorted stub - a section of transmission line less than a quarter wave length at 50 mc - was connected to each side of the dee.
Anderson, Half-Scale Model Tests on the Three Quarter Wave R.F. System — UCRL-31 (1947) — p. 9
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The recovery plan if a next machine's fixed-frequency cavity misses its target after assembly. Both fixes tax drive power, and the directions dictate the design bias: aim the design HIGH in frequency if you want to trim with the cheaper capacitive side (which only moves frequency down), or low if you accept stub-trimming up. The cited shift/power figures are that cavity's calibration, not guaranteed ranges.
-
The dee throat (stem junction) is a current maximum and the region most sensitive to volume or inductance changes: resetting small dee-to-liner clearances there moved the upper limit 46.2 -> 47.1 mc and cut power 6%. Detail the throat drawings and hold the clearances.
Source quote & editorial note
This region is a current maximum point at the highest frequency and most sensitive to volume or inductance.
Anderson, Half-Scale Model Tests on the Three Quarter Wave R.F. System — UCRL-31 (1947) — p. 10
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: On a small machine the dee-stem-to-chamber-wall clearance is the candidate critical region - it plausibly sets both the resonant frequency and where I^2R heating concentrates. Confirm with an eigenmode/surface-current calculation (or low-power RF measurement with a thermal camera) for the actual cavity, then machine that region to drawing rather than shimming by eye.
-
Acceptance criteria for a dee driver, 1947 edition: (1) dee voltage at least twice the DC plate voltage; (2) the oscillator must remain stable while sustaining an arc drawn from the dee face — a deliberate spark test simulating in-tank discharges; (3) RF plate voltage not excessive; (4) phasing capacity near the calculated value.
Source quote & editorial note
The dee voltage must be at least twice the d.c. plate voltage. 2. The oscillator must be stable enough to sustain an arc drawn from the dee face (simulating discharges in that region). ... 4. The phasing capacity, as calculated in MacKenzie's report ..., should be as near [the calculated value] as possible.
Anderson, Half-Scale Model Tests on the Three Quarter Wave R.F. System — UCRL-31 (1947) — p. 12
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The requirement transfers as a criterion, not a procedure: the planned LDMOS amplifier must demonstrably survive dee-side arcs before it is trusted in vacuum, where conditioning sparks are guaranteed. For solid-state that means proving the protection chain - VSWR trip, drain clamping, fast drive-cut (dg-338, dg-679) - against controlled fault tests, not drawing an open arc onto an unprotected amplifier the way the 1947 tube crews could.
-
Measure inaccessible element capacities by bridge subtraction: measure with the moving element in and out and subtract to isolate each element, then series-combine. The model's rotary-condenser swing: 1370 uuf max to 50 uuf min - printed as ratio 27.6, though 1370/50 computes to 27.4 (a source arithmetic slip or a rounded input; dg-501 pattern).
C_element = C_assembled - C_element_removed; series C = 1/(1/C1+1/C2); swing 1370/50 uuf = 27.4 (source prints 27.6)Source quote & editorial note
Ratio Max-capacity/Min-capacity = 1370/50 = 27.6
Anderson, Half-Scale Model Tests on the Three Quarter Wave R.F. System — UCRL-31 (1947) — p. 14
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Same differential technique as Koeth's Rutgers dee-capacitance note in this collection: an LCR meter plus one disassembly step estimates the selected lumped capacitances in a tank model - subject to fixture and stray-capacitance errors, which set how many elements one subtraction chain can honestly resolve.
-
A closed-form, size-independent solution exists for the cyclotron dee-gap field (Schwarz-Christoffel, per Murray & Ratner 1953 with corrections): for zero-thickness semi-infinite plate pairs at y = +/-h, tips at x = +/-k, potentials -/+V0, the median-plane field and potential are two-line formulas once one transcendental equation is solved. Geometry caution: k is the HALF-gap and h the HALF-aperture (plate tips map exactly to x = +/-k; re-derived from eq. 1 during extraction — the Fig. 1 scan invites misreading the full gap as k).
median plane (eqs. 6-8): E_x(x,0) = (V0/h)*sech(X1)/(1 + alpha*sech^2(X1)); V(x,0) = sign(x)*(2*V0/pi)*arccos(sech(X1)); with X = pi*x/(2h) = X1 + alpha*tanh(X1); alpha = (1-a^2)/a^2; a from (pi/2)*(k/h) = arccosh(1/a) + sqrt(1-a^2)/a^2. E_y = 0 on the median plane; E_x even, V odd in x. (Report writes E = +dV/dx — fix sign on implementation.)Source quote & editorial note
This paper presents in summary formulas for the computation of electric fields and potentials of an idealized cyclotron dee geometry.
Beal, Computation of Electric Field and Potential of an Idealized Dee Geometry — MSUCP-12 (1961) — p. 6
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: TRACKER SEED (flagged): this is directly implementable as the gap-field model in the tiny and the next machine's Python trackers — roughly ten lines plus a Newton solve — replacing or validating FEMM electrostatic maps. Identify 2h with the dee aperture, 2k with the dee-to-dummy-dee gap, 2V0 with the full dee-to-dummy-dee voltage (a grounded dummy dee is the same solution shifted by a constant, V0 = V_dee/2).
-
The same solution gives the full off-median-plane E field — the ingredient needed for electric (gap) focusing models: E_x and E_y anywhere in the aperture follow from two coupled transcendental equations in (X1, Y1). Beal tabulated only the median plane, but eqs. 1-5 contain the whole 2-D field.
physical convention (E = -grad V): E_x = -(V0/h)*Xv/(Xv^2+Xu^2); E_y = -(V0/h)*Xu/(Xv^2+Xu^2) with the report's Xv, Xu, F as tabulated (the report prints the positive-gradient convention - flip the sign before tracking); potential v = arccos(cos(Y1)/F) needs the antisymmetric branch for x < 0 (plain arccos returns the same value both sides); verify an implementation against finite differences of VSource quote & editorial note
Therefore, equations 2 and 4 coupled with equations 3 and 5 can be used to determine the electric field and potential at a point X, Y of the dee region.
Beal, Computation of Electric Field and Potential of an Idealized Dee Geometry — MSUCP-12 (1961) — p. 5
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: E_y(x,y) is what a tracker needs for the Rose/Wilson electric gap-focusing term - available analytically at any point, no field map required. Whether that term dominates first-turn axial stability on a sub-kV machine is for the axial-stability calculation to say; implement, verify against finite differences, and let the tracking decide.
-
Solve the gap-field transcendental equation with Gordon's iteration: Murray-Ratner's original converges slowly for small alpha and not at all for large alpha, while Gordon's Newton linearization of tanh(X1) 'was found to work well for all cases', with local quadratic convergence and the source's two-branch initial guess (X1 ~ X/(1+alpha) for small X1; X1 ~ X - alpha for large X1).
eq. 9: X1_new = [X - alpha*tanh(X1c) + alpha*X1c*sech^2(X1c)] / [1 + alpha*sech^2(X1c)], X1c the current iterate; initial guess X/(1+alpha) or X-alpha by branchSource quote & editorial note
The iteration process suggested by Murray and Ratner for calculation of X1 converges slowly for small values of a, and does not converge at all for large a. An iteration process, described below, suggested by M.M. Gordon was used and was found to work well for all cases. ... This iteration is Newtonian in character such that if a given X1 has an error of order e, then X1 given by equation 9 will have an error at order e squared. ... X1 ~ X/(1+a) for X1 small ... X1 ~ X - a for X1 large.
Beal, Computation of Electric Field and Potential of an Idealized Dee Geometry — MSUCP-12 (1961) — p. 7
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Copy the iteration and its initial-guess branch into the tracker's field routine; iterate to a set tolerance - quadratic convergence is local, so the branch guess is what makes it robust - cheap enough to call per integration step, or use once to build a spline.
-
The peak accelerating field at the gap center - the median-plane centerline value in this idealized geometry - saturates at V0/h, set by the APERTURE, not the gap: E(0) = (V0/h)/(1+alpha) = 0.994, 0.948, 0.870, 0.654, 0.489, 0.378, 0.306, 0.253, 0.216 times V0/h for k/h = 0.1 through 3.5. Narrowing the gap below the aperture height buys almost nothing.
E(0) = (V0/h)/(1+alpha), exact from eq. 6; k->0 limit E_x = (V0/h)*sech(pi*x/(2h))Source quote & editorial note
Table 1. k/h = 0.1: at x/h = 0, E/(V0/h) = 0.99388 [values verified against page image]
Beal, Computation of Electric Field and Potential of an Idealized Dee Geometry — MSUCP-12 (1961) — p. 11
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Sets the ceiling on CENTERLINE gap field for a dee redesign: with a 1-inch aperture (h = 0.5 in) and 2.5 kV dee-to-dummy, the median-plane peak cannot exceed ~2 kV/cm however tight the gap. Two cautions: local surface fields at electrode edges run above the centerline value - breakdown cares about those (dg-353) - and widening the aperture trades centerline field for beam height by the table's factors, not one-for-one at every k/h.
-
The gap field leaks far under the dees: E falls to half its central value only near x/h ~ 0.85 (narrow gap) and the potential reaches 90% of V0 only around x/h ~ 2, so the effective accelerating gap is on the order of the full aperture 2h, not the physical gap 2k. Hard-edge gap models mis-time the kick and miss the field a particle still feels one aperture-height into the dee.
narrow-gap half-width x(E = Emax/2) = (2h/pi)*arccosh(2) = 0.838*h; V/V0 = 0.90 near x/h ~ 1.6 for k/h = 0.1 (analytic narrow-gap limit; the table's 0.73760 at x/h = 1.0 and 0.94468 at 2.0 bracket it), moving toward ~2.6 by k/h = 1.5Source quote & editorial note
Table 1, k/h = 0.1: V/V0 = 0.73760 at x/h = 1.0, 0.94468 at 2.0 [verified against page image]
Beal, Computation of Electric Field and Potential of an Idealized Dee Geometry — MSUCP-12 (1961) — p. 11
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Transit-time factors and gap-crossing phase errors must be computed on this extended profile - and whether a delta-kick model is adequate is the transit parameter's call: evaluate omega*L_eff/v for the actual first-turn velocities and the ~2h-long field region, and let that number, not a blanket assumption, decide when the distributed kick is needed.
-
Do not use the parallel-plate V/d estimate for dee-gap fields: for wide gaps (k/h >= 2) the mid-gap field sits ~25% below 2V0/(2k) because flux escapes through the aperture (k/h = 2.0: 0.378 vs 0.5 naive; 3.5: 0.216 vs 0.286), and the field maximum moves off-center to just inside the dee tips (x/h ~ k/h - 0.7); for narrow gaps the uniform-field picture fails entirely and V/d wildly overestimates the peak.
wide-gap plateau E ~ 0.75*(V0/k); max off-center for k/h >= 2: E_max at x/h = 1.2, 1.6, 2.2, 2.8 for k/h = 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 [from Table 1]Source quote & editorial note
Table 1, k/h = 2.0: E/(V0/h) = 0.37823 at x/h = 0, maximum 0.38966 at x/h = 1.2 [verified against page image]
Beal, Computation of Electric Field and Potential of an Idealized Dee Geometry — MSUCP-12 (1961) — p. 16
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Kills the tempting E = V_dee/gap for FIELD estimates on a next machine's geometry, where gap and aperture are the same order (k/h ~ 1) and neither limiting approximation holds - use the formulas or tables for the profile. Energy gain is a different question: absent transit-time effects the work across the gap is q*V0 whatever the profile; the profile changes transit-time factors and where field concentrates - and the surface fields at electrode edges, which the breakdown margin actually cares about (dg-353, dg-1028).
-
Table 1 is a ready-made verification dataset: E/(V0/h) and V/V0 at x/h = 0 to 5.0 in steps of 0.2, five significant figures, for nine gap ratios k/h = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 — computed on MISTIC (D. A. Johnson's fixed-point program), the same machine as the MSUCP-9 orbit codes. [Erratum 2026-08-30, from an upstream implementation + scan/math verification: the transcribed equations are EXACT (E(0)/(V0/h) = a^2 identically), but Table 1's printed values are reliable only to ~3 decimals — the 1960 computation carried its a-roots to 4 decimals, giving up to 3.2e-3 relative error at k/h = 2.0, each block internally consistent with its own imprecise root. Verify implementations against the equations, not the printed table; matching the table to only ~1e-3 is the signature of a CORRECT implementation.]
benchmark anchors: E(0)/(V0/h) = 0.99388 (k/h=0.1), 0.87049 (0.5), 0.65448 (1.0), 0.48916 (1.5), 0.37823 (2.0), 0.21623 (3.5); V/V0 at x/h=1.0: 0.73760, 0.70319, 0.60615, 0.48545, 0.38270, 0.21862 respectively [printed values, reliable to ~3 decimals — see the rule's dated erratum]Source quote & editorial note
Table 1 gives values of electric field and potential for a wide range of dee gap arrangements. [tables span PDF pages 11-19]
Beal, Computation of Electric Field and Potential of an Idealized Dee Geometry — MSUCP-12 (1961) — p. 11
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Unit-test targets for the tracker's gap-field routine AND an independent check on FEMM electrostatic runs: model the same idealized geometry once and agree within a DOCUMENTED convergence tolerance - set by a mesh/domain convergence study against the table's demonstrated accuracy - before trusting FEMM on the real electrode shapes; the table's five printed digits are formatting, not a five-digit acceptance criterion — a five-figure match to the printed table would mean an implementation reproducing the paper's rounding errors (see the rule's dated erratum).
-
Know the idealization's edges before leaning on it: the solution is 2-D (infinitely long straight edge — no dee-tip curvature, corners, or azimuthal variation), zero plate thickness, semi-infinite plates, electrostatic (quasi-static per RF cycle), no space charge, and symmetric +/-V0 drive. Beal's MISTIC computations covered alpha < 4, i.e. k/h < ~3.77, though the formulas themselves have no such limit.
Beal's MISTIC computations covered alpha < 4; the alpha-to-geometry conversion needs the source's definition re-read before quoting a k/h bound (the previously printed formula evaluated to ~2.06, not its own claimed 3.77 - scan re-read queued; the likely intended form is k/h = (2/pi)*(arccosh(sqrt(1+alpha)) + sqrt(alpha*(1+alpha))), which gives 3.77 at alpha = 4)Source quote & editorial note
A fixed point computer program written by D.A. Johnson for use on MISTIC was used to calculate the above equations for Ex and Vx at the point (X,0) with alpha<4. [defs: alpha = 1/A ; A = a^2/(1-a^2) ; (pi/2)(k/h) = cosh^-1(1/a) + (1-a^2)^1/2 / a^2]
Beal, Computation of Electric Field and Potential of an Idealized Dee Geometry — MSUCP-12 (1961) — p. PDF 8 (printed p. 5), Sec. IV Results, for the alpha<4 statement; alpha's definition on PDF 7 (printed p. 4), and the k/h relation on PDF 5 (printed p. 2)
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: For use on a next machine, the real deviations to check against FEMM are finite dee thickness, the rounded tip, and the curved gap line near the source at small radius - run the comparison over the actual geometry rather than assuming the analytic solution's quality at any radius; near center the ion-source chimney dominates the field regardless.
-
When a resonator must tune over a band, vary the transmission-line characteristic impedance along its length - Nevis's profile (~6 -> ~2 -> 8 ohm) tends to minimize the required capacitor Cmax/Cmin ratio - and budget for structure inductance at the RF frequency considerably increasing the effective Cmax (their full-scale capacitors: 6.5/1.3 nF measured at 1000 Hz).
Nevis: Z0 ~6 ohm -> ~2 ohm -> 8 ohm profile gave Cmax/Cmin = 6.5 nF / 1.3 nF (measured at 1000 Hz)Source quote & editorial note
The basic variation of line Zo along the resonator tends to minimize the capacitor Cmax/Cmin ratio needed. Inductance effects in the structure at the RF frequency considerably increase the effective Cmax value. It is expected that the full scale capacitors will each have Cmax = 6.5 nF and Cmin = 1.3 nF (measured at 1000 Hz).
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: FM machinery itself does not transfer, but the impedance-profiling option applies to any tunable tank or swept/trimmed cavity: model the resonator as a transmission line and let the optimization pick the profile - Nevis's own is nonmonotonic, so 'taper' is the idea, not the shape.
-
DC-float the dee/resonator so that a negative bias 'of amount sufficient to control multipacting' can be applied - the Nevis provision, with their planning value at -500 to -2000 V (Part II).
Nevis planning value: dee DC bias -500 to -2000 V (Part II, p.48)Source quote & editorial note
The dee resonator will be dc floating so a negative bias of amount sufficient to control multipacting can be applied.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Directly relevant at a next machine's planned 5-13 kV dees, where multipactor bands are widest: a 1971 operating-lab remedy with a concrete magnitude to scale from. Bias works by breaking the multipactor resonance condition; what trajectories do in detail depends on the local fields, so 'sufficient to control' is found empirically - exactly as Nevis wrote it.
-
Foil flatness is an orbit-quality parameter: ripples increase the effective source thickness and thereby degrade performance - the flatness requirement Chalk River states for its in-dee stripper-foil system (the chain-changer mechanism, lifetimes and magazine details are the paper's description - re-read queued).
Source quote & editorial note
foils must be flat since ripples increase the effective source thickness and thereby degrade the performance.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The cleanest statement in this collection that foil flatness is physics, not cosmetics - applicable to any internal foil in proportion to how its incidence geometry turns ripple into path-length spread; and the Chalk River system stands as an existence proof that in-vacuum consumable-changers can share space with a live dee structure (details per the re-read).
-
Expect oscillation start-up failure specifically where the dee IS the oscillator tank: the report contrasts machines driven from external oscillators with their own resonant tanks (slight difficulty) against simple-dee-as-tank-circuit systems, which have trouble breaking into full oscillation (the quoted difficulty; the contrast's other half is on the same page - scan re-read queued).
Source quote & editorial note
in cyclotrons using a simple dee system as the tank circuit difficulties are encountered in getting the oscillator to break into full oscillation.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: DIRECT: this names the exact configuration of the reference machine - a simple dee system as the tank circuit - and matches its documented pattern of RF amplifiers failing to bring the dee to voltage. Multipactor loading in the ~100 V band is the report's named mechanism and a testable CANDIDATE cause, not a confirmed diagnosis: the bias and drive-through cures (dg-1274) double as the discriminating experiments.
-
The report's menu for multipactor-band start-up: (1) bias the dee and stem several kV from ground - customary on FM cyclotrons - which this report rejected as 'too awkward to apply, chiefly because the variable frequency requirement had already led to a rather complicated mechanical design'; (2) drive the oscillator strongly from an external source so the voltage rises through the ~100 V multipactor region faster than the loading builds (the quoted mechanism); the report's own contribution is the impulse-shock start. [2026-09-06 erratum, scan re-read: the stated cost of dee bias is mechanical complexity compounding an already-complicated variable-frequency design, not HV isolation as previously written.]
Source quote & editorial note
multipactor loading, which occurs with voltages of the order of a hundred, cannot build up sufficiently to prevent the rise of voltage through the multipactor region.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The decision menu for any machine that stalls in the multipactor band: bias, drive-through, or impulse shock. On a small machine the driven start maps to an external exciter ahead of the power stage; the bias cure maps to a DC offset on an insulated dee (dg-320, dg-805), with the magnitude found empirically.
-
Pick the multipactor cure that does not fight your mechanical architecture: Rochester rejected dee biasing not on physics grounds but because insulating the dee/stem for several kV of DC bias was too awkward on an already complicated variable-frequency (telescoping shorting bar) structure, and built an impulse starter instead.
Source quote & editorial note
The dee biasing scheme was considered too awkward to apply, chiefly because the variable frequency requirement had already led to a rather complicated mechanical design.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Transferable decision pattern: on a machine whose dee stem is grounded through the tank structure, retrofitting DC bias means rebuilding the stem insulation, so Rochester's choice of an impulse starter is the additive option. Additive is not hazard-free: a shock starter is a high-voltage pulser coupled into an RF vacuum structure and needs a rated feedthrough, insulation and current limiting, grounding, an interlock, and a check for RF coupling and unintended arcs. Compare the two cures by the actual RF/HV insulation and safety design, not by port count. [Corrected 2026-08-23: earlier note said the starter "touches nothing but a spare port".]
-
Third multipactor cure - impulse (shock) excitation: a small coupling loop in the dee stem tank, fired by a capacitor discharge through an air spark gap, rings a surge of HF current into the tank; on the cited machine the dee circuit then began oscillating at several hundred volts amplitude and the oscillator carried the voltage up to full value unaided.
kick target: clear the top of the machine's own multipactor band (order-100-V class on the cited machine) - measure the stalled band on the actual resonator; the oscillator does the restSource quote & editorial note
the dee circuit begins to oscillate with a dee voltage amplitude of several hundred volts. The oscillator then begins to carry the voltage on up to its full value.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: One loop, one capacitor, one spark gap, one HV supply - a genuinely cheap cure for a stalled self-excited start. The transferable insight is that the kick need only clear the loading band, not deliver operating power; what that band and required amplitude ARE on a given resonator is a measurement, not an inheritance from the 27-inch.
Cited in: Driving the Dee: RF Coupling
-
The decay envelope of a ringing dee can map multipactor-band edges: in the cited apparatus, spark-induced dee oscillations fell smoothly until the voltage reached roughly 1/3 of its (few-hundred-volt) maximum, dropped steeply through a loading band, then decayed slowly again below it - consistent with multipactor loading occupying a BOUNDED voltage window, refining mddc-1045 p.12 (discharge exists only below ~500 V extinction) with an observable top edge. The observation bounds the band but does not discriminate between the proposed gap and axial multipactor mechanisms.
sharp-drop onset at ~1/3 of the ringdown maximum; loading band top ~ order 100 V hereSource quote & editorial note
the envelope of the oscillations was found to fall smoothly until the dee voltage had fallen to a value roughly 1/3 its maximum, then for a short time to drop steeply, then afterward to decay slowly once again.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A free diagnostic worth running: ring the dee (impulse or drive-and-release), scope the pickup envelope through a calibrated divider, and look for a kink - a steep-decay segment is a candidate multipactor band on YOUR machine. Corroborate with pressure and conditioning dependence before labeling it multipactor (other nonlinear losses kink envelopes too), and don't transfer the 1/3 ratio - localize your own band and compare it with the operating voltage.
Cited in: Driving the Dee: RF Coupling
-
Dee construction pattern for water-cooled copper dees: 1/8-in electrolytic high-conductivity copper skin with 1/4, 3/8 and 5/8-in copper tubes silver-soldered on the back for cooling; each dee and stem SPLIT longitudinally so halves separate for repair; joining surfaces of liner sections silver-plated for RF contact; the movable shorting "spider" that tunes the resonant line held at ~100 lb per lineal inch of contact pressure, with spring-loaded gear- and cable-driven fingers, externally controlled. Dees 53 in dia on 9.75-in OD stems inside a 31-in ID liner.
Source quote & editorial note
The skin is of electrolytic high conducitvity copper with 1/4, 3/8, and 5/8" copper tubes silver soldered on the back side for water cooling.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The construction vocabulary transfers as a menu, not a mandate: EHC copper skin with cooling sized from computed RF loss (a tabletop dee at tens of watts may need none), silver-plated joints where measured contact resistance warrants, high-pressure sliding contacts only on genuinely movable RF joints, and split-for-repair weighed against the RF seam it adds. Same contact-pressure concern as the nyo-9683/ornl-2648 sliding-contact rules when a movable short exists.
-
Size oscillator power from Q and dee reactance before choosing a tube, then add margin for what the analysis cannot know: UW measured/computed system Q ~ 7500 (line alone ~11,000 before dee and joint losses), dee capacitive reactance X ~ 40 ohms, so 160 kV peak gap needs ~21.2 kW and 250 kV needs ~52 kW; 150 kW was selected as the provided maximum "upon considering the approximations necessarily made in this type of analysis" (150 kW would drive ~450 kV — above what the dees could stand — so the margin is real headroom, not a target). Dees, stems, liner and supply components were all rated to the 150 kW figure, and the tube chosen to survive dee arcs.
P = Epk^2/(4*Q*X); 21.2 kW @ 160 kV, 52 kW @ 250 kV for Q=7500, X=40 ohmSource quote & editorial note
upon considering the approximations necessarily made in this type of analysis, the figure of 150 kw maximum r-f power was selected.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: DIRECT scaling method for the LDMOS upgrade: measure the dee system's Q and C, compute watts per kV from P = V^2/(4QX) (equivalently V^2/(2*R_shunt)), then add margin for what the lumped model misses - beam loading, coupling loss, arcs, duty cycle. UW's own practice sized 150 kW against a ~52 kW computed requirement, roughly 3x, 'upon considering the approximations'; let your margin come from your own unknowns inventory, with theirs as the precedent.
-
A two-dee system has two coupled modes - a zero mode with the dees swinging in phase (no accelerating gap voltage) and a pi mode swinging opposite (gap voltage present) - and the oscillator coupling must select the pi mode: the quote records UW choosing the drive method easiest to hold at 180 degrees. Mode spacing depends on the coupling geometry.
Source quote & editorial note
This method should be easiest of the methods used to assure oscillation at the proper frequency with the dees operating 180 degrees out of phase.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: For a one-dee-plus-dummy machine the mode problem collapses. For any driven system, verify which resonance the amplifier locks to - a network-analyzer sweep plus a phase comparison between dee pickups distinguishes the modes - because the wrong one accelerates nothing.
-
Plan the multipactor climb-through at design time: UW knew that 'electron oscillations in the vicinity of the dees and dee stems at low r-f voltages tend to absorb energy and prevent the oscillations from building up' - and designed for it; their booster/driver arrangement is the report's implementation (topology, rating and isolation details: scan re-read queued).
Source quote & editorial note
Electron oscillations in the vicinity of the dees and dee stems at low r-f voltages tend to absorb energy and prevent the oscillations from building up.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The corpus's driven-start cure (mddc-1045 tickler; nyo-9359's catalogue) as a 1951 DESIGN feature rather than a retrofit, including the half-frequency/doubler isolation trick that spares a changeover switch. Directly relevant to the reference machine's dee-voltage buildup pathology: any LDMOS drive chain is inherently a driven start, but only if it can push watts through the multipactor loading band without foldback or protection tripping - and that band's voltage is geometry-, frequency-, pressure- and surface-dependent, so measure it on the actual dee. [Note revised 2026-08-23: the earlier note quoted '~100 V' for the band as if it were a design constant.]
-
Multipactor physics in one sentence pair: electrons in the dee-ground gap whose transit time is half the RF period multiply when the secondary-emission ratio exceeds unity — "The threshold of secondary emission is about 150 electron volts for most surfaces; consequently, multipactoring becomes possible when the voltage across the dees reaches this value." One standard cure on the 88-inch: a dc sweeping field superimposed across the RF gap to pull electrons out faster than they multiply.
multipactor onset near the secondary-emission threshold (~150 eV -> ~150 V-class gap voltages) WHERE a resonant transit condition also holds; band edges move with gap, frequency and surface yieldsSource quote & editorial note
The threshold of secondary emission is about 150 electron volts for most surfaces; consequently, multipactoring becomes possible when the voltage across the dees reaches this value.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: DIRECT: a small machine's dee voltage passes through the ~100-150 V-class region on every start - whether multipactor actually lights there depends on the gap-frequency resonance and the surfaces' secondary yields, which is why some machines never see it. Completes this collection's cure set: mddc-1045 (bias + tickler), nyo-9359 (impulse start), ucrl-64 (volume reduction + bias).
-
Bake in a new dee system by letting it spark - by the hundred thousand: the 88-inch's conditioning involved several hundred thousand sparks, after which the dee would usually hold many times its initial voltage; each spark's energy (~4.5 J stored in that resonator) burns out the whisker or inclusion that initiated it - sparking as the conditioning mechanism, not merely a failure mode.
conditioning scale: ~1e5-1e6 sparks (88-inch); per-spark energy = the RESONATOR'S stored energy, computed from C, V and Q - never assumed from physical sizeSource quote & editorial note
It usually involves permitting the dee to spark several hundred thousand times. Afterwards, it will usually hold many times the voltage that it would initially.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: For the 5-13 kV dee upgrade, plan a conditioning campaign rather than reading early sparking as failure - a supervised one: compute the actual stored and delivered fault energy first, current-limit and arc-detect, set the auto-recycle behavior from that arithmetic, monitor temperatures, and inspect between sessions. Corroborates the ornl-2648/nyo-9683 conditioning rules and quantifies the count.
-
Budget resonator power in four named parts, and the beam is not negligible: for the 88-inch at 70 kV dee — RF skin losses 121 kW (computed several ways from the measured voltage/current distribution of the resonator), stray-ion loss at the machine center ~30 kW at maximum energy, beam power 60 kW (1 mA at 60 MeV), miscellaneous (couplings, harmonics radiated into the tank) ~10 kW; total 221 kW, so 300 kW was provided. A corrugated dee stem (longitudinal corrugations increase skin perimeter) cut current density enough to save ~70 kW of the copper loss.
P_total = P_skin + P_stray-ion + P_beam + P_misc; 88-inch @ 70 kV: 121 + 30 + 60 + 10 = 221 kW -> 300 kW installedSource quote & editorial note
At the maximum particle energy, the beam requires 60 kw of power.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The four-line budget is the right form at any scale. A tabletop version: watts of copper loss (dg-313), a beam line computed from ITS current and energy - 1 nA at 500 keV is 0.5 mW, 10 uA at 1 MeV is 10 W, small only until the source improves - a stray-ion line that follows source gas and RF (measurable as the loading difference with the source on vs off), and a misc line that is mostly coupling and radiation.
-
Tune the fault-detector delay as a physics compromise, and Smith gives the number: the interlock signal is deliberately RC-slowed so the discharge persists about a millisecond — "long enough to vaporize the foreign material which initiated the spark. If the circuit is made too fast, it takes too long to bake the resonators in. If it is made too slow, the spark damage to the dee and liner surfaces will be excessive. Experience indicates that 1 msec is about the right delay." (Overcurrent faults in tube anode/grid circuits bypass this delay and open the hard-tube modulator in ~10 us.)
Spark dwell before interrupt: ~1 ms (conditioning); tube overcurrent path: ~10 usSource quote & editorial note
The signal from the rf-dc interlock is slowed down by an RC circuit, so that the discharge will persist for about a millisecond. ... Experience indicates that 1 msec is about the right delay.
Smith, The RCA 6949 as a Self-Excited Cyclotron Oscillator — UCRL-9435, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory (1960) — p. PDF p. 7 (printed -7-)
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A protection spec you cannot derive from electronics alone: the dwell is chosen so each spark finishes cleaning the spot that caused it. The compromise transfers; the number does not - Smith's ~1 ms suits his machine's stored energy and electrode scale, so a tabletop supply picks its own dwell from its fault energy, starting shorter and lengthening only if conditioning stalls. Amplifier-device faults still trip as fast as the electronics allow: two speeds, two purposes.
-
Keep the maximum orbit radius a few millimetres inside the pole radius: with 150 mm poles the dee inside diameter was 140 mm, so rho = 70 mm is 5 mm short of the pole edge where the field starts to fall.
rho = r_pole - 5 mm (reference machine)Source quote & editorial note
Da der Innendurchmesser des Dees 140 mm beträgt, hat ρ den Wert 70 mm und ist damit um 5 mm kleiner als der Polradius [tr.: dee ID 140 mm, rho 70 mm, 5 mm less than pole radius]
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Treat the 5 mm as this machine's geometric margin, not a rule: COLUMBUS runs a very LARGE gap-to-diameter ratio (75/150 = 0.5), so its field is far from flat at the edge anyway and the machine needs no extraction. For a 20 cm pole with a 2-3 cm gap the ratio is much smaller and the flat region proportionally wider - but the usable radius still comes from a measured or FEMM field map plus orbit-excursion and clearance checks, not from a fixed edge offset.
-
Dee voltage does not set the final energy (ideal on-crest model): the magnet and usable radius fix the ladder height, the voltage is the rung spacing - k = E_max/(q*U0) crossings, first-orbit radius r1 = sqrt(2*(q/m)*U0)/omega_cyc.
k = E_max/(q*U0) ; v1 = sqrt(2*(q/m)*U0) ; r1 = v1/omega_cycSource quote & editorial note
Die Endenergie der Ionen ist so etwas wie die Höhe einer Leiter und die Beschleunigungsspannung ist dann der Abstand der einzelnen Sprossen [tr.: final energy is the ladder height, voltage the rung spacing]
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Recomputed for 1000 V protons at 185 mT: r1 = 24.7 mm, matching the book. A 150 keV machine at 1 kV needs 150 ideal crossings; at 5 kV only 30 - relaxing vacuum and field-error tolerance roughly in proportion. The idealization to keep visible: real voltage also moves capture, turn separation and whether the top rung is reachable at all (dg-1376's ceiling-vs-attainability).
-
The minimum dee amplitude is the one whose first orbit clears the ion source: on COLUMBUS, protons clear from U0 >= 200 V and H2+ from U0 >= 400 V on the first turn (r1 ~ 11 mm at their respective fields, against the 20 mm chimney region).
r1 = sqrt(2*m*U0/q)/B; clearance threshold U0_min ~ (B*r_clear)^2*(q/m)/2 (ideal full-qU0 first kick)Source quote & editorial note
Protonen ab U0 ≥ 200 V und H2+-Ionen ab U0 ≥ 400 V – bereits beim ersten Umlauf – hinreichend weit von der Ionenquelle entfernt [tr.: clear of the source from 200 V / 400 V on the first turn]
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The scaling is the useful transfer: at 0.6 T and a 15 mm clearance radius the same ideal estimate gives ~3.9 kV for protons - so a sub-kV dee on a higher-field machine would NOT clear a 15-mm-class source housing under these assumptions; trace the actual source and gap geometry (launch phase, initial position, 3-D fields) before trusting the ideal number either way.
-
Bound the dee amplitude from above by the actual weakest insulator: on COLUMBUS the vacuum feedthrough's voltage rating limited U0 to <= 3000 V, and the matchbox output was designed to that bound.
U0_max = feedthrough ratingSource quote & editorial note
Aus Gründen der Spannungsfestigkeit der Durchführung ist U0 ≤ 3000 V [tr.: because of the feedthrough voltage rating, U0 <= 3000 V]
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A 5-15 kV dee upgrade is an insulation-coordination problem across the WHOLE RF path - feedthrough, stem supports, matching capacitors, connectors, plus contamination and conditioning state - with the feedthrough a frequent but not guaranteed weakest link. Specify every element for peak RF plus any DC bias, in vacuum, with tracking margin.
-
The authors state that with dee voltages below 2-3 kV they are 'on the safe side' for students beside the machine. Editorial: this is the authors' judgment for their apparatus, not a measurement, and a regulatory exemption threshold (the 5 kV class for incidental emitters) is a legal boundary, not a physical one.
Source quote & editorial note
Mit Spannungen kleiner als 2–3 kV sind wir auf der sicheren Seite [tr.: with voltages below 2-3 kV we are on the safe side]
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Electron energies equal to the dee voltage produce bremsstrahlung with end-point energy of the same value; at 3 keV any metal wall stops it, at 15-30 keV it does not, and stray electron currents in a multipacting dee are not bounded by the beam current. Flashover can also occur below 3 kV with bad geometry, pressure or contamination. Check, do not assume: evaluate the actual electrode potentials, survey with a suitable low-energy detector at operating power, and treat viewports and thin windows as the weak points.
-
Measure the dee input impedance before designing the RF chain: COLUMBUS's dee-plus-stem measured about 330 kOhm - and if that is the resonant parallel loss resistance, the acceleration power is tiny: P = U0^2/(2*R_p) = 6 W at 2 kV peak.
P = U0^2/(2*R_p) for U0 peak and R_p the resonant parallel loss resistance; at 10 kV into 330 kOhm, ~150 WSource quote & editorial note
Diese beträgt nach aktuellen Messungen ca. 330 kΩ [tr.: according to current measurements this is about 330 kOhm]
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The scaling explains why a 100-500 W amplifier class suits a 5-13 kV dee - sized with margin: P_source >= U0^2/(2*R_p*eta) with measured end-to-end efficiency eta (matchbox, feedline and base-load losses all sit between amplifier and dee), and the larger dee's own R_p measured, not borrowed from this machine.
-
With a single-ended drive, the book's design shortens the grounded electrode into a dummy dee - since it sits at chamber potential, the region behind it is already field-free; the hot dee keeps its full depth.
ideal peak gap voltage: U0 (grounded counter-electrode) vs 2*U0 (opposite-phase push-pull at the same per-electrode amplitude U0)Source quote & editorial note
Da ein Dee wie die Vakuumkammer selbst auf Masse liegt, kann dieses Dee verkürzt werden [tr.: since one dee is at ground like the chamber, it can be shortened]
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Single-dee-plus-dummy gives half the energy gain per turn of an ideal push-pull pair at the same per-electrode amplitude, in exchange for one feedthrough and one resonator - a trade that favors simplicity on most small builds; state the amplitude convention whenever quoting the factor of two.
-
COLUMBUS chose the accelerating gap and the dummy-dee depth as one common dimension - 20 mm each, 'on plausibility grounds' - the book posing the two dimensions as a single question when dimensioning the dummy dee.
gap = dummy-dee depth = dee aperture height = 20 mmSource quote & editorial note
Bei der Dimensionierung des Dummy-Dees stellt sich natürlich die Frage nach der Tiefe und der Größe des Beschleunigungsspalts gap. Aus Plausibilitätsgründen wurde jeweils ein Maß von 20 mm gewählt. [tr.: in dimensioning the dummy dee the question arises of its depth and the size of the accelerating gap; on plausibility grounds 20 mm was chosen for each]
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A wide gap simplifies the source mount (the chimney sits inside it) at the cost of transit-time factor; choose the gap from the transit calculation - T = sin(x)/x with x = omega*g/(2v) over the actual injection and orbit velocities - rather than adopting either 20 mm or any other fixed number.
-
The book's worked vacuum trade for a 16 keV H2+ target at 4e-5 mbar (l ~ 3 m): 2000 V needs 8 crossings, 1000 V needs 16 crossings and 2.76 m of path, 'barely reached with 3 m'; below that the criterion fails before full energy. This is the source's attenuation CRITERION, not a hard reachability wall - at s = lambda the uncollided fraction is ~37%, and survival falls smoothly, so read the table as a loss budget.
k = E/(q*U0); s_ges(k) vs l_bar(p); survival = exp(-s/lambda) for constant lambda. Recomputed: r1 = 17.5 mm, sum sqrt(i) i=1..16 = 44.47 -> 2.45 m arcs + 0.32 m gaps = 2.76 m; at 2000 V the same geometry gives ~1.27 m arcs + 0.16 m gaps = ~1.43 m total. Caution: the bitmap Table 6.2 lists 2.44 m and 1.27 m - arcs only, without the k*gap term; use the text figure.Source quote & editorial note
Für 16 Beschleunigungen wären 2,76 m Weglänge erforderlich, die mit 3 m knapp erreicht werden [tr.: 16 accelerations need 2.76 m of path, barely reached with 3 m]
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Recomputed: r1 = 17.5 mm, sum sqrt(i) for i=1..16 = 44.47, giving 2.45 m of arcs plus 16*0.02 = 0.32 m of gap = 2.76 m. Caution: the bitmap Table 6.2 lists 2.44 m and 1.27 m, i.e. arcs only without the k*gap term; use the text figure.
-
Extraction geometry for a chimney source in a single-dee machine: a narrow slit on the chimney side facing the dee, two puller electrodes attached to the dee, ions leaving on the negative half-wave only. No counter-beam forms on the positive half-wave because the chimney sits at dummy-dee (ground) potential and has no slit facing the dummy dee.
Source quote & editorial note
Zu diesem Zweck wurden an dem Dee zwei Extraktions- bzw. Pullerelektroden angebracht. Nun bleibt noch die eingangs gestellte Frage zu klären, warum kein zweiter Ionenstrahl während der positiven Halbwelle entsteht. Ein Grund dafür ist die Tatsache, dass die Ionen nur aus dem Schlitz extrahiert werden können, der dem Dee gegenüberliegt. Ein weiterer Grund ist das Potenzial des Kamins, das das gleiche ist wie das des Dummy-Dees, nämlich Masse. Somit könnten auch während der positiven Halbwelle der Beschleunigungsspannung keine Ionen in das Dummy-Dee extrahiert werden. [tr.: two extraction/puller electrodes were fitted to the dee; the question why no second ion beam forms during the positive half-wave is answered by two reasons - ions can only leave through the slit facing the dee, and the chimney sits at the same potential as the dummy dee, namely ground, so no ions can be extracted into the dummy dee during the positive half-wave]
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Grounding the chimney with a one-sided slit answers the reverse-beam question students raise - by construction on this machine. If the source is biased instead, the slit-to-puller spacing, the bias polarity and the counter-beam question all reopen: analyze, don't assume.
-
A cyclotron can run with a single dee and no dummy dee, using the grounded chamber itself as the counter-electrode: El Cerrito did so and, with its second chamber, produced a 7 uA proton beam at 1,600 W operating RF power (2,000 W maximum available to the electrodes).
Source quote & editorial note
The El Cerrito Cyclotron used only one dee, and did not employ a 'dummy dee,' but rather held the chamber itself at ground. ... The system was operated at 1,600 watts and could provide a maximum of 2,000 watts to the electrodes. ... with the new vacuum chamber a beam of 7 microamperes was produced.
Cressman, The Design and Construction of a Small Cyclotron — Houghton College thesis (2006) — p. 15
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Deleting the dummy dee simplifies the in-chamber assembly at the cost of a less-defined gap field; the precedent documents that the geometry can work at the microampere scale - it does not promise that current class, which came from the whole machine, not the electrode choice alone.
-
Electrode-gap datum, the Cyclotrino (30.5 cm poles, approximately 1 T, 1987) used a dee and dummy-dee pair separated by approximately 1 mm, an extremely narrow accelerating gap on a low-energy mass-spectrometry cyclotron.
Source quote & editorial note
A dee and dummy dee system was used with the electrodes separated by approximately 1 mm.
Cressman, The Design and Construction of a Small Cyclotron — Houghton College thesis (2006) — p. 16
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A millimetre-class gap maximizes gap FIELD per volt and can improve the transit-time factor - the ideal energy gain per crossing stays q*deltaV regardless - while tightening alignment, flatness and holdoff tolerances (field enhancement rises as the gap closes). One documented small end of the range, not an established bound; choose the gap from the transit-time and holdoff calculation (dg-1396).
-
Two brass dees of differing radii created the ion extraction path on Niell's machine, with a small copper sheet set into the path of ions leaving the larger dee as the collector.
Source quote & editorial note
A system of two brass dees with differing radii allowed for ion extraction. ... For a collector, a small copper sheet was set into the path of ions leaving the larger dee, which drew electrons to itself when the ion beam was incident.
Cressman, The Design and Construction of a Small Cyclotron — Houghton College thesis (2006) — p. 16
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: An asymmetric dee pair is a construction-level extraction trick published almost nowhere else - the radius step letting outward-spiraling ions escape the smaller electrode's envelope is the natural geometric reading (our reconstruction; the survey states the arrangement and the collector, not the mechanism), and no deflector is mentioned for this machine.
-
Bent glass rods served as combined mechanical supports and electrical insulators for the dees, holding them in position and standing both dees off the grounded bottom plate (Niell cyclotron, 1994-1995).
Source quote & editorial note
The dees were held in place with bent glass rods, which also raised both dees off the bottom plate.
Cressman, The Design and Construction of a Small Cyclotron — Houghton College thesis (2006) — p. 16
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Flame-bent glass rod is cheap, vacuum-compatible standoff stock with a real precedent (and the same survey shows glass slides used similarly) - as HISTORICAL construction: for a new build, treat surface flashover, creepage geometry, cleaning, and flame-bending residual stress as the qualification items; bulk dielectric strength is the one property that was never the problem.
-
A single 1.3 cm thick copper rod both mechanically supported the dee assembly and carried the RF connection from the dee to the matching transformer (Rutgers cyclotron, finished 2001).
Source quote & editorial note
the assembly was supported by a 1.3 cm thick copper rod that also connected the dee to the RF matching transformer
Cressman, The Design and Construction of a Small Cyclotron — Houghton College thesis (2006) — p. 17
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Making the RF feed a structural member gives a rigid connection and can save a penetration - count your own: an internal support needn't pierce the wall at all, and low loop inductance comes from the LENGTH and return-path geometry, not rod thickness. The 1.3 cm is Rutgers' as-built datum; size a new rod from RF current, mechanical load and the actual loop.
-
Knox's dees: two copper dees mounted on blocks of insulating dielectric so each could be moved independently, operated at 3,750 V with a manually adjustable resonating circuit (as-built values; the machine had not been successfully tested by its publication, dg-1463).
Source quote & editorial note
Two dees were constructed of copper and were mounted with blocks of insulating dielectric material such that they could be moved independently of each other. ... The dees were operated at 3,750 V, using a manually adjustable resonating circuit.
Cressman, The Design and Construction of a Small Cyclotron — Houghton College thesis (2006) — p. 18
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Independently adjustable dee mounts let gap and centering be tuned after assembly rather than machined perfectly the first time - the transferable idea. Treat 3.75 kV as reported without a stated convention (peak vs RMS, dee-to-ground vs gap not specified in the survey), i.e. a datum with an asterisk, not calibration.
-
Focusing performance datum from the second cyclotron (11-inch, 1932), as the thesis reports it: the electrode was 1 cm thick and the ion beam produced was less than 1 mm wide, attributed to the combined electric and magnetic focusing.
Source quote & editorial note
the electrode was 1 cm thick, and the ion beam produced was less than one mm wide
Cressman, The Design and Construction of a Small Cyclotron — Houghton College thesis (2006) — p. 26
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Passive fringe-field focusing compressed a working machine's beam to millimetre scale - encouraging, but don't divide the two numbers: the 1 cm is the electrode's THICKNESS, not necessarily the clear aperture, and the survey doesn't give the beam-width direction. Whether a centimetre-class dee aperture bottlenecks a new machine is an envelope/acceptance calculation, not this datum.
-
Hollow dee fabrication from sheet, two equal semicircular plates of 0.9 mm copper cut from a 145 mm diameter disc are soldered to an edge strip of the same stock to form the hollow electrode, then the open face is squared on a milling machine to final dimensions of 14.3 mm thick, 142.4 mm front-to-back, and 68 mm side-to-side; a single 8-32 brass screw through the back fastens the dee to its feedthrough, with a locking washer to keep the screw tight and the dee from rotating.
Source quote & editorial note
The open face of the dee was squared using a milling machine, to give the final dimensions of 14.3 mm thick
Cressman, The Design and Construction of a Small Cyclotron — Houghton College thesis (2006) — p. 40
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Soldered thin-sheet construction plus one milling pass on the gap face gives a straight accelerating edge without hogging a cavity from solid - the transferable fabrication move. The single-screw-plus-lock-washer mount is the historical retention only: for a new build add a positive anti-rotation feature (key, second fastener) and a qualified RF contact, since a lock washer neither prevents rotation reliably nor makes a stable RF joint.
-
The grounded dummy dee need not be a cavity at all, it was built as an open rectangular frame from two 0.9 mm thick by 5 mm wide copper strips (one 171.5 mm long bent into three sides, one 142.9 mm straight piece on top), grounded through a soldered fine copper wire (MDC KAP2) and a barrel connector to the feedthrough.
Source quote & editorial note
The dummy dee is made from two 0.9 mm thick by 5 mm wide strips of copper
Cressman, The Design and Construction of a Small Cyclotron — Houghton College thesis (2006) — p. 40
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Reducing the grounded electrode to a strip frame saves material, mass, and pumping-shadow volume while still defining the accelerating gap; the precedent indicates only the driven electrode needs an enclosed field-free interior.
-
Houghton's dee-gap fixture as built: three insulating glass microscope slides glued across both electrodes with Loctite 1C Hysol vacuum epoxy hold the pair as one rigid assembly at fixed spacing.
Source quote & editorial note
held together by three insulating glass microscope slides, which were glued to the copper with Loctite 1C Hysol vacuum epoxy
Cressman, The Design and Construction of a Small Cyclotron — Houghton College thesis (2006) — p. 41
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The idea worth keeping is fixing the alignment-critical gap OUTSIDE the chamber, as one assembly. Glass slides are flat and cheap but not vacuum-qualified as supplied: clean and bake them, use a low-outgassing adhesive with a controlled bond line, check creepage across the glass between driven and grounded copper, and test the assembly at full RF voltage under vacuum before trusting it - insulator surfaces spanning electrodes are where flashover lives.
-
Filament mounted directly on the dummy dee (Rutgers prototype), powered through two diametrically placed feedthroughs - the filament kept isolated from ground so it could be negatively biased to raise its electrons' energy.
Source quote & editorial note
The filament was mounted on the dummy dee, and was powered by wires that entered and exited through two diametrically placed feed-throughs. ... The filament was kept isolated from ground so it could be negatively biased to increase the energy of the emitted electrons.
Cressman, The Design and Construction of a Small Cyclotron — Houghton College thesis (2006) — p. 17
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Using the dummy dee as the source's mechanical platform puts the emitter at the gap with no extra standoff hardware - the documented arrangement; whether the two-feedthrough run keeps the loop taut against Lorentz forces is our engineering reading, so anchor the leads deliberately either way (dg-1463's lesson).
-
2022 operating configuration per THPO001's Table 1 and text: 140 mm (5.5 in) dee diameter in a chamber 200 mm diameter x 75 mm high; flux density 185 mT (H+) / 370 mT (H2+); dee voltage 0.5-3.0 kV; final energy ~4.1 keV (H+) / ~7.5 keV (H2+).
Source quote & editorial note
[a] chamber with a diameter of 200 mm and a height of 75 mm. ... Diameter of the Dees 140 mm (5.5 in) Flux density 185 mT (H+) | 370 mT (H2+) ... Dee Voltage 0.5 - 3.0 kV Final Energy ~ 4,1 keV (H+) | 7,5 keV (H2+)
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A long-serving teaching machine running protons at half its field capability eases magnet, RF and matching demands at the cost of energy. The quoted energies imply a ~48-50 mm detection radius (nonrelativistic equilibrium-orbit calculation at the stated fields - a derived number, not a printed one); treat the table as the published 2022 configuration without assuming every entry is a measured operating value.
-
Reference operating point of the ISU undergraduate cyclotron (1961, the source's stated operating conditions): 17,000 gauss center field, 22.5 cm dee diameter, 10 kV peak dee-to-dee (V0 = 5 kV dee-to-ground used in the calculations, per the figure annotations), dee height 2.4 cm, dee gap 1.4 cm — the 1.5 MeV machine's working parameter set, with calculations run to 11 cm radius (the companion Burns paper reports about 2 uA maximum beam current, dg-1573).
Source quote & editorial note
carried out on the Iowa State University undergraduate cyclotron which operates under the following conditions: Magnetic field strength, B0 — 17,000 gauss; Diameter of dees — 22.5 cm; Peak dee-to-dee voltage, 2V0 — 10 kv; Dee height, 2k — 2.4 cm; Dee gap — 1.4 cm
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: a fully documented parameter set for a very-high-field undergraduate build — 1.7 T on a small pole is what buys MeV-class energy in 11 cm with only 10 kV of RF. The rigidity relation sets the energy-radius product (a uniform 1.7 T at 11 cm would give somewhat more than the reported 1.5 MeV; the real radial profile droops); the RF voltage sets gain per turn and phase acceptance, not the final energy. It anchors the high-field corner of the small-machine design space.
-
Thin-gap kick model for orbit codes (ISU, 1963): treat the dee electric field as concentrated in a zero-width region at the center of the dee gap — each crossing adds energy eV with V = V0*cos(theta), momentum changed only perpendicular to the gap and parallel to the median plane, position unchanged during the kick, with series expansions for the resulting velocity and direction changes. Once an ion suffers an electric deceleration it is assumed never to reach greater energy — the source's supporting argument being that a later radius exceeding that of the first deceleration would imply higher energy, contradicting the energy lost in deceleration.
per crossing, delta E = e*V0*cos(theta); delta v = dE/(m*v) - dE^2/(2*m^2*v^3) + ...Source quote & editorial note
the electric field is considered as concentrated in a region of zero width at the center of the dee gap. The dee-to-dee voltage is defined as V; therefore, a proton will receive a boost of energy, ∆E = eV, when it crosses the dee gap. It is assumed that the momentum is altered only in the direction perpendicular to the dee gap and parallel to the median plane ... During this instantaneous acceleration r, and z are not altered ... If an orbital radius were to exceed that of an initial deceleration, the proton energy would increase since velocity and radius are proportional; however, this contradicts the loss of energy in deceleration. Hence, it is assumed that once a proton suffers an electric deceleration it will never reach a greater energy.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: the impulse-at-gap approximation is the standard trick that keeps a homebrew tracker fast — integrate smooth magnetic motion between gaps and apply discrete energy kicks; this study checked its implementation against one-step analytic predictions. First-deceleration is the study's termination convention, backed by its radius-energy argument — for another machine verify that argument holds (or track on to exclude later recovery), and benchmark the zero-width gap against a finite-gap/transit-time estimate where the gap is not small compared to the orbit.
-
Axial-amplitude safety margin versus orbit centering (ISU trajectory study, 1963, at 9 cm starting radius): maximum axial displacement grows steeply with initial orbital displacement delta-r — for delta-r = 0.5 cm, an ion needed initial axial amplitude below 1/6.1 of the dee height for the source's '100% certainty' of never striking the dees (Figure 6: maximum axial displacement about 6 in units of the initial amplitude at that displacement).
Source quote & editorial note
To obtain Figure 6, a series of calculations was performed with r0i = 9cm, θ0 = 0, σz′ = Nπ/8 and δri varying from 0.1cm to 1.0cm. For each value of δri the maximum value of |z| was obtained. For example, if a proton entered the orbit with δri = 0.5cm, its axial amplitude should be less than 1/6.1 times the height of the dees if there is to be 100% certainty that the proton will not strike the dees.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: dee aperture is consumed multiplicatively by orbit-centering error — in this modeled geometry a half-centimeter centering error left about a sixth of the aperture usable through the resonance. The '100% certainty' is the model's own, within its tracked initial conditions and field approximation. Center the source and first turns well, or budget aperture for resonance-driven axial growth.
-
RF system architecture under development (no beam) for the IUAC table-top cyclotron — a broadband solid-state RF power amplifier up to 2 kW CW feeding an impedance matching network and a dee/dummy-dee accelerating structure, supervised by a GDR-based digital LLRF controller, with the stated aim of generating and maintaining high RF voltage across the dee-dummy-dee gap.
Source quote & editorial note
The development includes a broadband solid state RF power amplifier up to 2 kW CW, Impedance matching network (IMN) and GDR based Digital LLRF Controller. The aim of the RF system is to generate and maintain high RF voltage across Dee-Dummy Dee to accelerate the particles from the ion source of Cyclotron.
IUAC, Annual Report 2024–25, Chapter 3 — Research Support Facilities (table-top cyclotron RF system) — p. 18
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: the amplifier-IMN-dee chain with a digital feedback controller is the modern minimal RF architecture for a small cyclotron, and the dee/dummy-dee (single-dee) geometry matches common amateur practice. The 2 kW CW is this amplifier's rated maximum, not a derived drive requirement — the power a given machine needs follows from its dee voltage, shunt impedance, coupling and losses, so treat the rating as one professional team's headroom choice for an MeV-class teaching machine.
-
Resonance tuning and feedback instrumentation of the IUAC table-top cyclotron RF (development status, pre-beam) — frequency is fine-tuned with a vacuum variable capacitor, and a capacitive pick-up built into the cyclotron chamber provides the feedback signal from which the digital LLRF controller and a motorized tuner control and maintain RF voltage and frequency.
Source quote & editorial note
Frequency is fine tunes with vacuum variable capacitor. A capacitive pick-up built-in the Cyclotron chamber is used as feedback in order to control and maintain the RF voltage and frequency of the system using a digital LLRF controller and a motorized tuner.
IUAC, Annual Report 2024–25, Chapter 3 — Research Support Facilities (table-top cyclotron RF system) — p. 18
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: building the capacitive pick-up into the chamber from the start — rather than improvising one later — is the design habit to copy: early provision simplifies every scheme that reads the cavity field from a pick-up, including the dee-voltage calibration chain on this machine. Other feedback routes exist (directional-coupler signals, other probe types); a motor-driven vacuum variable capacitor is an amateur-accessible tuner implementation.
-
Practical RF power limits reported for the Rutgers 12-inch cyclotron: about 500 watts is the amount that can be safely used for prolonged operation, 1 kW has been tried only for very brief periods of about 30 seconds, and those powers corresponded to approximately 10 kVp-p and 11 kVp-p on the DEE respectively (500 W and 600 W).
Source quote & editorial note
Presently, the practical amount of RF power that can be safely used for prolonged operation is about 500 watts. Operating with power levels on the order of 1kW have been tried, but only for very brief periods (30 seconds). […] The first betatron image (left sinusoidal pattern) is of 500 watts and the second (right sinusoidal pattern) was with 600 watts of RF power. The RF power of 500 watts corresponded to approximately 10 kVp-p and 600 watts corresponded to approximately 11 kVp-p.
Koeth, Hanebuth, Hoffman & Schneider, Rutgers 12-Inch Cyclotron Ion Source Studies: Part II (2007) — p. 3
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A scale-matched RF data point: about 500 W forward power buys ~10 kVp-p on this 12-inch dee in this resonator, stated by the authors as their prolonged-operation practice; 1 kW was ATTEMPTED for ~30-second periods (~11 kVp-p at 600 W per the same figure). The source does not say what sets the limit — heating, breakdown, matching components — so read the numbers as one resonator's operating envelope, not as permission for pulsed operation at double power.
-
To raise extracted current the Rutgers 12-inch group mounted angled brass plates ("pullers") on the face of the DEE next to the ion source aperture and thinned the chimney wall near the aperture; a Poisson-Superfish model showed the field at the plasma sheath increased by a factor of 760, Langmuir-Child's law then predicted a 130-fold increase in peak emitted ion current, and measurements showed approximately two orders of magnitude increase.
Source quote & editorial note
The new chimney's wall was thinned near the aperture to increase the amount of field that penetrates into the plasma column. To further take increase the local electric field, angled brass plates were mounted on the face of the DEE near the ion source aperture. The plates were named "pullers" for their obvious role in ion extraction. A simple PSF model showed that the field at the plasma sheath increased by a factor of 760. According to the Langmuir-Childs' (LC) law a 130 fold increase in the peak emitted ion source should result.[5] Already measurements show approximately two orders of magnitude increase, and significantly more is expected once better initial steering is accomplished (discussed later).
Koeth, Hanebuth, Hoffman & Schneider, Rutgers 12-Inch Cyclotron Ion Source Studies: Part II (2007) — p. 4
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The highest-leverage source modification in this memo, entirely within tabletop means: angled brass pullers on the dee face plus a thinned chimney wall near the aperture. The prediction chain is the source's own — modeled sheath field ×760, a Langmuir-Child-based prediction of ×130 in peak emitted current, measured ≈×100 — and its internals are not fully spelled out: a naive I ∝ V^3/2 scaling of a ×760 equivalent-voltage gain would predict far more than ×130, so the source's figure evidently folds in the real extraction geometry. Carry the design move and the measured two-orders-of-magnitude result; re-derive any prediction for your own geometry with your own field model.
-
The Rutgers 12-inch group inferred DEE voltage from the beam itself: images of the first revolution at differing RF input power were calibrated in pixels against the 0.25 inch diameter of the chimney, the beam radius gave the ion energy from radius, magnetic field and mass, and twice that energy was plotted against previously measured peak-to-peak DEE voltage, showing strong agreement with the older rectifier data plus a slight increase attributed to improved Q from reworking the RF matching box.
Source quote & editorial note
A series of images were taken at differing RF input power levels. The ion beam's radius was calculated by using a calibration of the images pixels against the 0.25 inch diameter of the chimney. The initial energy of the ions (protons in this case) was determined from the calculated radius, magnetic field and the mass; and was then plotted as a function of input power. Twice the energy data was plotted against previously quoted peak-to-peak DEE voltages.[6] There is strong agreement with the older data; a slight increase in DEE voltage for a given power is seen – this is attributed to improvement in the Q from reworking the RF matching box.
Koeth, Hanebuth, Hoffman & Schneider, Rutgers 12-Inch Cyclotron Ion Source Studies: Part II (2007) — p. 5
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: An independent, non-electrical dee-voltage calibration for any machine with a viewport — valuable precisely because divider and probe measurements are the usual error source at this scale. The physics of the factor of two, stated correctly: the imaged initial arc follows the FIRST gap crossing, so its radius measures the energy qV_peak; doubling converts V_peak to the peak-to-peak voltage the older rectifier data quoted. Identify which turn you are imaging and know the local field before applying it. Fig. 13 shows the resulting curve out to ~1400 W forward power against a theoretical curve with Rs = 0.8 Ohms.
-
Historical puller-geometry data point cited by the Rutgers group from Livingston, Holloway and Baker (Rev. Sci. Inst. 10, 63, 1939): for a 0.0625 inch diameter aperture, pullers with a vertical 1/4 inch gap residing 1/4 inch away from the aperture yielded best results; the Rutgers authors note this parameter space had not yet been explored on their own machine.
Source quote & editorial note
Optimization of the puller placement and vertical gap needs further investigation. Livingston found that for a 0.0625 inch diameter aperture that pullers with a vertical ¼ inch gap residing ¼ inch away from the aperture yielded best results. [7] This parameter space for our cyclotron has not yet been explored. It is clear from figure 12 that the ions initial radius is very large, thus the pair of pullers plates could be replaced with by a single solid plate with just an aperture in it.
Koeth, Hanebuth, Hoffman & Schneider, Rutgers 12-Inch Cyclotron Ion Source Studies: Part II (2007) — p. 5
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A historical calibration point rather than a recipe: Livingston, Holloway and Baker's 1939 optimum for a 1/16-inch capillary aperture was a 1/4-inch puller gap at 1/4-inch standoff — quoted approvingly here by authors who explicitly had NOT explored that space on their machine. Scan or model gap and standoff for your own extraction voltage, field and aperture. The memo's single-apertured-plate suggestion is an untested option for cases where trajectory calculation shows the first-turn radius clears the plate — verify, don't assume. (The quoted passage begins on p.5 — where the 0.0625 inch figure appears — and concludes on p.6.)
-
Although the Rutgers 12-inch radial-sector AVF tips were never intended to accelerate beam, SIMION showed protons could be brought to the periphery in them given enough dee voltage: at the machine's normal 8 kV-peak the phase slippage was too severe, but 20 kV-peak accepted ions over 20 degrees of the RF cycle and carried them to full radius.
Source quote & editorial note
While the constructed radial sector pole tips were not intended to support acceleration, with sufficient DEE voltage protons were successfully accelerated. The incurred phase slippage at normal operating conditions - namely a DEE voltage of 8 kV-peak - was indeed too severe to successfully bring ions to the full radius. However, a DEE voltage of 20 kV peak accepted ions over 20° of the RF cycle and accelerated … them to the periphery. This suggested that our first attempt is not too far from a practical design.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Quantifies what a non-isochronous field costs in dee voltage, on this field and RF model: at the machine's normal 8 kV-peak the slippage was fatal; 20 kV-peak accepted a 20° RF window and carried protons to the periphery — a factor of 2.5, for this map. Recalculate the acceptance-versus-voltage curve for your own field, harmonic and RF waveform; the transferable shape is that voltage buys phase margin against a mismatched field (dg-1786 is the measured version of the same lesson). Simulation results, not measured beam.
-
Iteratively tuning drive frequency and amplitude in SIMION for the Rutgers 12-inch AKG270 spiral field found the lowest dee voltage that still delivered a proton to the target to be 6 kV-peak at 15.534 MHz — below the machine's normal 8 kV-peak operating point and well below the 20 kV-peak needed by the non-isochronous radial-sector field.
Source quote & editorial note
Protons were flown with RF in SIMION with the AKG270 magnetic field. The trajectory of a single proton is shown in Figure 21. The driving frequency and amplitude were iteratively tuned to locate the minimum peak DEE voltage necessary to successfully accelerate the proton to the target. This lowest practical voltage found in the simulation was 6 kVpeak at a frequency of 15.534 MHz.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Quantifies the payoff of designing for isochronism, within one simulation campaign: 6 kV-peak at 15.534 MHz sufficed in the AKG270 spiral field, versus the 20 kV-peak the non-isochronous radial-sector field needed and the machine's normal 8 kV (both from the same study's radial-sector section, dg-1716). If shunt impedance and loading were unchanged, cavity loss ∝ V² would differ by ~11× between 6 and 20 kV — a conditional estimate, computed here. The frequency checks: 15.534 MHz ↔ ~1.02 T for protons at the fundamental (computed). Field shaping as a lever on the RF budget is the transferable idea; single-particle simulation, not measured beam.
-
The Rutgers authors attribute the large initial vertical displacement of the beam — despite an ion source aperture in the median plane — to the early ions' sensitivity to any vertical electric field component, because the E-field from the source into the dee diverges quickly, so a slight offset of the dee with respect to the median plane produces a significant vertical kick. Their proposed mitigations are better dee alignment or installing "pullers" on the dee aperture in the region of the ion source.
Source quote & editorial note
The natural question that should be asked: if the ion source aperture is in the median plane, why then the large vertical displacement? This can be attributed to the early ions sensitivity to any vertical component of the electrical field. Inspection of Fig 5 shows that the electric field from the ion source into the DEE diverges quickly. Thus a slight offset of the DEE with respect to the median plane will provide a significant vertical component. This can be mitigated by the installation of "pullers" on the DEE's aperture in the region of the ion source – a possible student project.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Why a median-plane source aperture still launches vertically displaced beam: in the central source-to-dee region the extraction field diverges strongly, so any dee offset from the median plane hands the earliest ions a vertical kick. No tolerance number is given — the source's stated remedy is pullers on the dee aperture near the source (offered as a possible student project, not a demonstrated fix); tightening dee-to-median-plane alignment is the natural corollary a builder draws, not the source's measured mitigation.
-
Accelerating (dee) voltage on the Rutgers 12-inch must be tuned to a compromise for turn-by-turn imaging: if the voltage is too low the radial turn-to-turn separation is too small to distinguish consecutive turns in the beam image, and if it is too high the length of the turn-by-turn signal is reduced.
Source quote & editorial note
The accelerating voltage is adjusted to find a balance between two characteristics of the beam image: if the voltage is not large enough the radial turn to turn separation is too small and one cannot distinguish between two consecutive turns in the beam image, if the voltage is too large then the length of the turn by turn signal is reduced.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Practical operating guidance for anyone doing turn-resolved imaging on a small machine: dee voltage is the knob that trades turn separation against the number of turns in the field of view. Consistent with the turn-spacing relation Δr ≈ m·ΔE/(q²B²r) for energy gain ΔE per turn (equivalently m·ΔV/(qB²r) with ΔV the effective accelerating voltage) from the same program's 2006 betatron-motion note.
-
To run the Rutgers 12-inch (a proton machine) on deuterons for d(d,n)He3 neutron production, the RF was retuned to 7.15 MHz — approximately half the proton frequency, for q/m of one half — which required a new externally coiled tank-circuit inductor to bring the dee's 78 pF capacitance into resonance, with the coupling loop adjusted to present the RF power amplifier a pure 50-ohm load.
Source quote & editorial note
Primarily dedicated to proton acceleration, the cyclotron's Radio Frequency (RF) systems was retuned to 7.15 MHz to satisfy the magnetic resonance acceleration condition for deuterons having a q/m of half that of the single a.m.u. proton. A new, externally coiled, tank circuit inductor was wound to bring the DEE's 78 pF capacitance into resonance. The coupling loop was adjusted to present the RF power amplifier with a pure 50-ohm load.
Koeth, Neutron Production with a 12-Inch Cyclotron (2017) — p. 1
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Species matters and it can change the RF plant, not just a dial: at fixed field, deuterons run at about half the proton frequency, and the resonator plus matching network must reach it — on this machine that meant winding a physically new tank inductor, because the existing tank could not tune an octave down. The 78 pF dee capacitance is this 12-inch machine's measured value; use it as a sanity anchor, not a design number.
-
The RF chain for neutron runs on the Rutgers 12-inch was a programmable Tektronix AFG3101 100 MHz arbitrary function generator (supplying both RF drive and the timing trigger), a solid state ENI-350L intermediate stage, and an Ameritron AL-82 linear final rated 1500 watts continuous. Lack of active dee cooling limited the RF power to about 1000 watts average, and pulsed RF operation was used to reach the highest dee voltage possible without exceeding thermal tolerances. The RF auto tuner was only usable in CW operation.
Source quote & editorial note
A programmable Tektronix AFG3101 100 MHz arbitrary function generator supplied the RF drive and timing trigger output. The intermediate RF stage utilized a solid state ENI-350L which in turn drove the final power amplifier, an Ameritron AL-82 linear capable of 1500 Watts continuous. Lack of active DEE cooling limited the RF power to about 1000 watts average. When not in CW mode, pulsed RF operation was used to simultaneously achieve the highest DEE voltage possible while not exceeding the thermal tolerances. The RF auto tuner was only employed during CW operation, as provisions have not been installed for pulsed operation.
Koeth, Neutron Production with a 12-Inch Cyclotron (2017) — p. 1
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A demonstrated tabletop RF plant, end to end: arbitrary function generator (drive + timing), solid-state intermediate stage, and an amateur-radio HF linear (AL-82 class, 1500 W continuous) into the matched tank. In THIS installation the uncooled dee — not the amplifier — set the ~1000 W average ceiling, and pulsing bought peak dee voltage inside that thermal budget (the auto-tuner only worked CW). Another machine repeats the analysis: matching range, tank losses, feedthrough heating and duty rating decide where its own ceiling sits.
-
(draft report) The shortest pulsed mode achieved on the Rutgers/UMD 12-inch used only 230 RF cycles at 7.15 MHz — an RF drive pulse of 30 microseconds duration — which after a 20 microsecond ring-up time (a consequence of the high Q of the tank circuit) produced a 10 microsecond beam-on-target pulse; with such a short pulse the repetition rate could safely be raised to 200 pulses per second.
Source quote & editorial note
the cyclotron was pushed into its shortest pulsed mode operation yet, with only 230 RF cycles at 7.15 MHz (an RF drive pulse of 30 us duration), which resulted in the generation of a 10us beam-on-target pulse after the 20us ring up time. With such a short pulse duration, the pulse repetition rate could safely be increased up to 200pps (200Hz). Figure 2 shows the RF pulse structures on an oscilloscope with a time base of 10us/div: the upper trace is driving RF pulse, lower trace is actual DEE voltage, note the ring-up-time is due to the high Q of the tank circuit.
Koeth, Gilde & Moroch, Measurement of Neutron Diffusion Time from Fast Pulsed Systems (draft, 2020) — p. 2
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Quantifies the price of a high-Q resonant dee for pulsed work on a tabletop machine: two thirds of a 30 microsecond drive pulse is spent ringing up, leaving 10 microseconds of usable flat top. A builder planning fast pulsed operation must budget the ring-up time explicitly. 230 cycles at 7.15 MHz is 32 microseconds, consistent with the stated 30 us. Draft report. (The quoted passage opens on the last line of p.1.)
-
On the Rutgers 12-inch cyclotron the vacuum chamber runs at 10E-5 Torr and holds a 5-inch radius DEE plus dummy DEE, driven at up to 10 kV peak RF over a tunable 2-30 MHz range; protons and 2H+ come from an internal cold-cathode Penning Ion Gauge (PIG) source, and diagnostics are a radial probe and a deflector each carrying a phosphor screen / current collector.
Source quote & editorial note
holds a 5-inch radius DEE and dummy DEE with a peak applied RF voltage of 10 kV and tunable frequency 2 - 30 MHz.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: PDF p.1 = printed p.291. A self-consistent parameter list for a machine at exactly this scale: 5-inch dee radius inside 12-inch poles, "10E-5 Torr" as printed — read as 1×10⁻⁵ Torr, the operating pressure the companion paper WEPPT025 states unambiguously — and a reported 10 kV peak applied dee voltage over a tunable 2–30 MHz range. The single-dee-plus-dummy-dee topology and the every-diagnostic-is-also-a-current-collector pattern are the parts worth copying; the numbers are reference-machine parameters, not targets.
-
The Rutgers 12-inch cyclotron has a single 5-inch radius DEE with a 0.9 inch vertical aperture facing a matching dummy DEE; the RF supply tunes 2-30 MHz with power adjustable to 1.5 kW, runs continuous or pulsed, and reaches a peak DEE voltage of 10 kV.
Source quote & editorial note
The cyclotron has a single 5-inch radius DEE with a 0.9 inch vertical aperture and a matching dummy DEE. The Radio Frequency (RF) supply is tuneable from 2 to 30 MHz with power adjustable up to 1.5 kW; it can be operated in continuous or pulsed mode and is capable of achieving a peak DEE voltage of 10 kV.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: PDF p.1 = printed p.369. The RF benchmark for the tabletop class as one machine's data point: 1.5 kW of tunable drive and a 10 kV peak dee voltage on a 5-inch dee — noting the two maxima need not be simultaneous, and what a kilowatt buys on another machine depends on its loaded Q, coupling and shunt impedance, which an upgrade should measure rather than scale. The 0.9-inch dee aperture is likewise this machine's choice, not a permitted fraction of any gap.
-
Dee mounting and high-voltage feed on the nine-inch cyclotron - the dee is carried on a 0.500 inch copper rod mounted to a CF2.75 flange, the whole assembly suspended from the chamber by a ceramic break terminated with CF2.75 flanges at either end, forming a vacuum-tight high-voltage feed-through whose copper stem protrudes several inches outside the flange for direct connection to the RF matching cabinet mounted just outside the magnet coils.
Source quote & editorial note
The DEE is supported by a 0.500 inch copper rod that is mounted to a CF2.75 flange. This whole assembly is then suspended from the chamber by a ceramic brake terminated with CF2.75 flanges at either end. This provides a substantial vacuum tight high voltage feed-though. The copper stem protrudes the vacuum flange by several inches allowing direct connection to the high voltage terminal in the RF matching cabinet, which is mounted just outside of the magnet coils.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The mechanically simplest dee feed-through arrangement in the amateur literature - the same copper rod is structural support, RF conductor and vacuum feed-through, with a commercially available ceramic break doing the insulating. Keeping the matching cabinet immediately outside the coils keeps the high-impedance high-voltage run short. Note the appendix drawing (PDF p.16) dimensions this copper stem as 0.375 inch with a 0.75 inch brass collar, which disagrees with the 0.500 inch in the text. The source spells "break" as "brake" and "feed-through" as "feed-though".
-
On the nine-inch cyclotron the second accelerating electrode is a "Dummy DEE" mounted diametrically in the chamber in direct electrical contact with it, which also serves as the central mounting surface for the ion source; the chamber median plane is adjusted to coincide with the magnetic median plane.
Source quote & editorial note
The chamber's median plane is adjusted to be the same as the magnetic field's median plane. The Dummy DEE is mounted diametrically in the chamber making excellent electrical contact as it provides the aperture of the second accelerating electrode. The dummy DEE also provides a central mounting surface for the ion source.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A topology that simplifies a small build: one driven dee (one HV feed-through) against a grounded dummy dee that doubles as a rigid, on-axis, at-ground mounting surface for the source — exactly where the source must sit. Whether one dee or two suits a given machine is an RF and symmetry decision, and some sources need bias or insulation rather than grounded mounting. The alignment rule worth copying outright: set the chamber median plane to the MAGNETIC median plane, not to the pole faces.
-
The nine-inch cyclotron's transmatch used the dee's own lumped capacitance (approximately 70 pF) as the tank capacitor, with the tank inductance an 8-turn coil 5 inches long of 2.14 square inch cross-sectional area wound from 1/4 inch copper refrigeration tubing, one end on the protruding dee stem and the other on chamber ground; a larger-cross-section 3-turn outer coil mounted coaxially about it formed the transformer primary, with adjustable taps to find the 50 ohm loading point.
fr = 1/(2*pi*sqrt(LC))Source quote & editorial note
It utilizes the lumped capacitance of the DEE, which is approximately 70pF, to create a tank circuit out of the chamber itself. Using the resonance equation for an inductor in parallel with a capacitor: fr=1/2(pi)sqrt(LC) L, the inductance, was chosen to bring the fr to resonance at 13.56 MHz. Initially, coarse tuning was to create an 8 turn coil of length 5 inches, with a cross sectional area of 2.14 inches^2, out of 1/4-inch copper refrigeration tubing.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The topology is the copyable part: use the dee-to-lid capacitance itself (~70 pF here) as the tank C, add an air-core tubing inductor, and couple through a coaxial few-turn primary with movable taps to find 50 Ω — no quarter-wave stem, no vacuum variable. Two numbers to reconcile on your bench: resonance at 13.56 MHz with 70 pF wants ≈2.0 µH (computed from the source's own equation), while Wheeler's formula on the printed coil geometry (8 turns, 5 in long, 2.14 in² area) yields only ≈0.8 µH — leads, strays and the actual in-situ capacitance evidently make up the difference, which is precisely why you measure fr in place and provide fine tuning rather than copying dimensions. (The 3-turn coaxial primary, adjustable taps and 50-ohm loading are printed on p.4.)
-
Dee voltage on the nine-inch cyclotron was measured with a vacuum rectifier charging a high voltage capacitor C1 to the peak RF voltage, bled off through a two-resistor divider of R1 = 750 megohms over R2 = 820 ohms, with a high-input-impedance DMM across R2; the resulting scale factor is peak dee voltage = 9.1E+5 times the voltage read on R2.
V(D-peak) = 9.1E+5 x V(r2)Source quote & editorial note
The high voltage capacitor, denoted as C1, was charged to the peak RF voltage through the rectifier and bled off by the high impedance resistor network. A DMM with a high input impedance was placed across R2 to measure the developed voltage. The ratio of R2 to R1 is 1:9.1E+5, thus the peak DEE voltage is: V(D-peak) = 9.1E+5 x V(r2)
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A workable absolute dee-voltage measurement built from a rectifier, a capacitor, two resistors and a DMM — which is to say, a HOMEMADE high-voltage RF probe, and it deserves probe-grade engineering: voltage-rated component strings, enclosure, a verified discharge path, remote reading. Its accuracy hangs on diode drop, leakage and the resistors' voltage coefficient, and the signal is small — at 1700 V peak the R2 reading is about 1.9 mV (computed), so calibrate the chain and estimate its uncertainty before quoting dee volts from it. The resistor values are read from Fig. 5 (R1 = 750 MΩ, R2 = 820 Ω); 750E6/820 = 914,600, consistent with the printed 9.1E+5.
-
On the nine-inch cyclotron the peak dee voltage rose as the square root of applied RF power, reaching approximately 1700 V peak at about 60 W forward RF power (from Fig.6), with roughly 1250 V at about 21 W and 500 V near 4 W; the induced peak voltage on the capacitive pickup was linearly proportional to the peak dee voltage (Fig.7), giving a simple day-to-day dee voltage reference.
Source quote & editorial note
As expected, the peak DEE voltage rises as the square root of the applied RF power, Fig.6, and the peak induced voltage is linearly proportional to the peak DEE voltage, Fig.7.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The method transfers, the number does not: measure YOUR dee voltage against forward power and expect approximate √P scaling while coupling and loaded Q stay fixed — this resonator's curve ran ~500 V near 4 W to ~1700 V at 60 W (points read from the rendered Fig. 6, 0-2000 V / 0-80 W axes; they bracket, not define, one exact coefficient). The practice worth copying outright: calibrate the cheap capacitive pickup against the rectifier divider once (Fig. 7's linearity), then use the pickup as the day-to-day reference. (The quoted sentence is the last line of p.4 and continues on p.5.)
-
The nine-inch cyclotron's appendix drawings are half-scale (Scale 1/2) top and side views dimensioned entirely in inches, laying out the chamber accessory ports at 0, 45, 90, 180, 225 and 270 degrees around a wall of 5.5 inch inside radius (11.0 inch inside diameter), with the dee shown as a 10.0 inch diameter D inside it; the side view carries the same 11.0 inch inside span with a 13.0 inch flange-to-flange overall, 2.0 inch chamber outside height and 0.25 inch lids.
Source quote & editorial note
All dimentions are in inches Scale: 1/2 TOP VIEW
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: A dimensioned drawing set — rare in the amateur literature — for one 11-inch-bore chamber: ports at 0/45/90/180/225/270 degrees, a 10.0-inch dee in the 11.0-inch bore (about 0.5 inch radial dee-to-wall clearance, computed), 13.0 inch flange-to-flange, 2.0 inch outside height, 0.25 inch lids. Use the angular map as a planning EXAMPLE — whether six azimuths serve a collector, flag, viewports and gauge without crowding depends on port diameters and the dee-stem geometry — and re-check mechanics, seals and RF clearances before cutting. (Dimensions read from the rendered sheets: top view PDF p.12, side view p.13, both printed rotated 90 degrees; "dimentions" as printed.)
-
The nine-inch cyclotron's accelerating gap is 0.5 inch - the appendix assembly drawing dimensions the separation between the dee edge and the flat "DEE MIRRORED FACE" of the dummy dee at 0.5, with the dee supported at top and bottom on 0.5 inch ceramic stand-offs and the dummy dee held on brackets; the dummy dee drawing carries the note that its inside dimensions mirror the face dimensions of the dee.
Source quote & editorial note
CERAMIC STAND-OFF / DEE MIRRORED FACE / BRACKET / POWER FEED-THROUGH / VACUUM PORT / ASSC. PORT 2 … [p.16 sheet callouts:] CERAMIC STAND-OFF (0.5") / DEE SHOWN WITH TOP PLATE REMOVED / 10.0 / 0.375 / 0.75 / ACTUAL SIZE
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: The documented geometry, as drawn: a 0.5-inch accelerating gap between the 1.00-inch dee and the mirrored dummy-dee face, dee on 0.5-inch ceramic stand-offs, inside the 1.50-inch chamber height with 0.25-inch dee-to-lid clearance. Reproduce it as historical reference geometry; whether the gap field is uniform enough and 0.25 inch stands your voltage are per-design questions for a field solve and a breakdown check. The dummy-dee sheet's "inside dimensions to mirror face dimentions of the DEE" note (PDF p.18, spelling as printed) is the fabrication shortcut: dimension the dummy by reference to the dee. (Drawing sheets are printed rotated 90 degrees; the p.15 assembly sheet labels the stand-off without a dimension — the 0.5" is on p.16.)
-
The nine-inch cyclotron dee drawings deliberately leave three dimensions unspecified for the machinist — the actual-size dee drawing carries the note that dimensions A, B and C (shown circled on the sheet) are to be determined by the shop — while the drawings fix the dimensions the design depends on (the 10.0 inch dee diameter, 0.375 inch stem hole and 0.75 inch collar appear as callouts on the p.16 sheet).
Source quote & editorial note
NOTE: DIMENSIONS A B & C ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY SHOP.
Editorial note, tabletop extrapolation: Craft practice worth naming for amateur builders: fix on the drawing what beam geometry, RF, vacuum and fit require, and hand the rest to whoever is cutting metal — an over-specified fabricated dee is a simple part made expensive. The qualification is the rule: shop-determined details are safe to leave open only where they cannot move the physics (a 1/16-in brass box's edge radii and joint allowances, plausibly; anything touching gap, aperture or stem, never). (Numbers read from the rendered drawings, printed rotated 90 degrees.)