--- title: "TID-5215 — Magnets and Magnetic Measuring Techniques · Cyclotron Info" canonical: https://cyclotroninfo.com/library/classics/tid-5215/ description: "Hosted public-domain copy of TID-5215 (1949), the Berkeley Radiation Laboratory volume on cyclotron magnet design, magnetic measurement, model magnets and full-scale testing, edited by Wakerling and Guthrie." generated: 2026-11-12 note: "Markdown rendering of the canonical HTML page, generated at build for AI assistants and text tools. Figures and interactive elements are described, not reproduced. On Design Guide rules the source quote, this site's paraphrase and this site's editorial note are labelled separately and must not be conflated." licence: "Datasets CC BY 4.0, census snapshot CC BY-NC 4.0 (https://cyclotroninfo.com/data/); cite as Cyclotron Info, cyclotroninfo.com" --- [Construction Classics](https://cyclotroninfo.com/library/classics/) # Magnets and Magnetic Measuring Techniques Wakerling, R. K., and A. Guthrie (eds.). *Magnets and Magnetic Measuring Techniques*, TID-5215. Radiation Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, for the United States Atomic Energy Commission, June 1949. 226 pages. Recovered from the [UNT Digital Library](https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc784168/) (TRAIL collection, ark `67531/metadc784168`). [Download PDF — 52 MB, 226 pages](https://files.cyclotroninfo.com/classics/tid-5215.pdf) The [magnet](https://cyclotroninfo.com/design-guide/magnet/) is the largest, heaviest and least reversible thing an amateur builds, and it is the subsystem this collection covers best — which makes it easy to miss that the coverage was assembled from magnet *chapters* of documents about whole machines. This is not that. It is a 226-page AEC volume about magnets and nothing else, from the laboratory that had built more cyclotron magnets than anywhere on earth, and it is organised the way the problem actually decomposes: what the beam requires, how to measure what you have, what a model can tell you, and what only the full-size magnet will. Its editors are worth noting. R. K. Wakerling and A. Guthrie edited the Berkeley volumes on vacuum equipment and technique that became standard references for a generation of laboratory practice; this is their magnets companion, and it is written in the same register — procedures and their failure modes rather than theory for its own sake. ## Why this closes a question this collection kept asking **Chapter 3 is a forty-page treatment of model magnets and their performance.** That subject has been the collection’s most-wanted missing piece for weeks: repository searches kept circling a 1947 Carnegie report on model magnets that has never been digitised, because the technique matters disproportionately at small scale. If you are building an 8-inch machine, a 2-inch model costs almost nothing and answers questions that are expensive to get wrong in the real iron. The chapter opens by stating its own result, which is the sentence that makes the method worth trusting: > Scale models of all of the types of magnets used in the calutron process were built and their performance characteristics measured. Estimates of the performance of the field-scale units could then be made with some assurance. By the use of models, the effects of changes in design could be explored quickly and with a sufficient degree of accuracy. **Later tests made on the full-scale magnets showed the model tests to be dependable and accurate.** That claim is then checked rather than asserted. Chapter 4 reports the full-scale tests against the model predictions, and the machines came in slightly *better* than the models said — track efficiency, field uniformity and stray field all on the favourable side of prediction ([dg-1322](https://cyclotroninfo.com/design-guide/#dg-1322)). A model that errs conservative is the only kind worth building, and this is the rare case where somebody published both halves of the comparison. The collection already held fragments of the practice — Carnegie’s 6-inch and 2-inch model magnets in [NYO-780](https://cyclotroninfo.com/library/classics/nyo-780/), the half-scale RF model in the [knowing before building](https://cyclotroninfo.com/library/classics/model-and-computation/) cluster — but those are reports of particular models built for particular machines. This is the chapter that treats modelling as a method: what scales, what does not, and how far to trust the answer. The document nobody could find turned out not to be the only place the subject was written down. **Read the chapter for its method, not its tooling.** In 1949 a scale model was the only way to see a field before the full-size iron existed. A builder today gets that picture from a field code first — the [modelling-tools page](https://cyclotroninfo.com/learn/modeling-tools/) describes the free ones, and FEMM in particular answers the questions this chapter answers with a 2-inch magnet, in an afternoon and for nothing. The professional sequence the collection documents is rough model, hand calculation, 2-D code, then 3-D code ([dg-080](https://cyclotroninfo.com/design-guide/#dg-080)); the scale model has moved from the first step of that loop to an optional last one. What has not moved is the chapter's substance: which quantities scale with the geometry and which do not, how saturation breaks the scaling, and how far to trust a prediction — a FEMM model and a scale model fail in the same places, at the excitation extremes where the iron's BH curve takes over ([dg-811](https://cyclotroninfo.com/design-guide/#dg-811)). Those are the pages to read with a simulation open beside them. ## Why this document can be hosted TID-5215 is a **United States Atomic Energy Commission report** in the TID series, prepared at the Radiation Laboratory of the University of California under AEC contract — the same publication basis as [TID-454](https://cyclotroninfo.com/library/classics/tid-454/) and the UCRL reports elsewhere in this collection. All 226 pages were searched for copyright notices, classification markings and distribution restrictions: **none appear**. Determination made August 2026, by reading the scan. ## The four chapters Page numbers are the volume’s own. Separately authored, and worth treating as four references. 1. **Some Basic Considerations Regarding Magnet Design Requirements** — Wilson M. Powell and Eneas Kane · Chapter 1, p. 1 What the beam asks of the magnet before any iron is cut: the field the orbit requires, how uniformity requirements arise from the physics rather than from taste, and the consequences for gap, pole and yoke. 2. **Magnetic Measuring Instruments and Techniques** — John De Pangher, R. K. Wakerling and A. Guthrie · Chapter 2, p. 30 The longest chapter, and the one with the least competition elsewhere in this collection: how field was actually measured in 1949 — the instruments, their calibration, their errors, and the procedures that make a field map mean something. 3. **Model Magnets and Their Performance** — R. K. Wakerling · Chapter 3, p. 126 How to learn a full-size magnet’s behaviour from a small one: what scales, what does not, and how far a model’s answer can be trusted. This is the chapter that makes the volume matter for a small machine. 4. **Magnetic Tests on Full-scale Magnets** — R. K. Wakerling and A. Guthrie · Chapter 4, p. 166 What the model does not tell you, measured on the real thing: acceptance testing, the discrepancies that show up at full scale, and shimming against them. ## About this copy The holding library serves this document as page images rather than as a PDF, and its download route is gated, so **this copy was assembled here from the library’s IIIF image service**, page by page, and given a text layer with open-source OCR in August 2026. No searchable copy was previously available. The masters are about 1500 pixels on the long edge — modest, but the volume is printed rather than typescript and reads cleanly at that resolution. The OCR is good enough to search and not good enough to quote. **Read numbers and formulae from the page image**, which is the standing rule for every scanned document in this collection and applies with extra force to a volume whose subject is measurement. At 52 MB it exceeds the 25 MB per-file limit of the site’s host, so like [ORNL-3540](https://cyclotroninfo.com/library/classics/ornl-3540/) and [TID-454](https://cyclotroninfo.com/library/classics/tid-454/) it is served from `files.cyclotroninfo.com`, whole and unrecompressed. ## Design rules from this document [35 Design Guide rules](https://cyclotroninfo.com/design-guide/?q=TID-5215) come from this volume, spread across all four chapters and concentrated in [magnet](https://cyclotroninfo.com/design-guide/magnet/) and [beam measurement](https://cyclotroninfo.com/design-guide/beam-measurement/). - [dg-1314](https://cyclotroninfo.com/design-guide/#dg-1314) — track magnet efficiency at two field levels as a saturation health check - [dg-1322](https://cyclotroninfo.com/design-guide/#dg-1322) — the model programme’s verdict: full-scale performance came in slightly better than predicted - [dg-1295](https://cyclotroninfo.com/design-guide/#dg-1295) — the copper-versus-power trade, stated plainly - [dg-1316](https://cyclotroninfo.com/design-guide/#dg-1316) — a quantitative “too far”: permeability around 100–150 at the working point Companion reading: [the magnet design deep dive](https://cyclotroninfo.com/learn/magnet-design/) assembles this collection’s magnet rules into a build sequence; [TID-454](https://cyclotroninfo.com/library/classics/tid-454/) carries Foss’s cost-driven magnet design; and [NYO-780](https://cyclotroninfo.com/library/classics/nyo-780/) is one institution’s account of building a magnet, models and all. > **Page provenance.** Last reviewed: 23 August 2026 · Assembled from UNT Digital Library page images (ark:/67531/metadc784168); rights review and OCR August 2026 · [Methodology](https://cyclotroninfo.com/about/methodology/) · [Report a correction](mailto:info@cyclotroninfo.com?subject=Correction%3A%20TID-5215%20%E2%80%94%20Magnets%20and%20Magnetic%20Measuring%20Techniques) · [Changelog](https://cyclotroninfo.com/changelog/)